1.浙江省台州医院口腔科,浙江 台州 317000
2.江西中医药大学附属医院口腔创伤整形科,江西 南昌 330000
Received:08 May 2024,
Published:25 May 2025
移动端阅览
崔美玲,王伟,蒋琳等.CBCT和MSCT三维重建颧上颌骨复合体的精度对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(05):390-394.
CUI Mei-ling,WANG Wei,JIANG Lin,et al.Accuracy comparison of three-dimensional reconstruction of zygomatic-maxillary complex by CBCT and MSCT[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(05):390-394.
崔美玲,王伟,蒋琳等.CBCT和MSCT三维重建颧上颌骨复合体的精度对比[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(05):390-394. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.05E024028.
CUI Mei-ling,WANG Wei,JIANG Lin,et al.Accuracy comparison of three-dimensional reconstruction of zygomatic-maxillary complex by CBCT and MSCT[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(05):390-394. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.05E024028.
目的
2
比较锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)三维重建的颧上颌骨复合体在穿颧种植相关参数上的精度差异。
方法
2
选取成人头骨标本5例(共10侧颧上颌骨复合体),根据穿颧种植临床应用特点,对每个头骨标本进行参数定位,再使用CBCT和MSCT进行扫描及三维重建。分别测量每个头骨标本及其CBCT、MSCT三维重建模型的穿颧路径与颧上颌缝交点处上颌骨颧突的厚度(L
B-B1
)、穿颧路径与颧骨表面中点交点处颧骨的厚度(L
C-C1
)、第二前磨牙与第一磨牙中间的牙槽突宽度(L
AR
)、第一磨牙的颊舌径宽度(L
M
)4个参数,实体标本组采用电子游标卡尺测量,CBCT组和MSCT组基于CBCT、MSCT测量。计算各个参数的绝对和相对误差,对CBCT和MSCT三维重建模型的精度进行对比分析。
结果
2
各参数测量数据具有较高的可信度和可重复性,组内相关系数(
ICC
)值≥0.90;CBCT组、MSCT组各参数测量结果与实体标本组比较,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);CBCT组的L
M
测量结果小于MSCT组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);CBCT组的L
B-B1
、L
C-C1
、L
AR
测量结果与MSCT组比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05);CBCT组的L
M
测量结果与实体标本组的平均绝对误差和相对误差均小于MSCT组,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05);CBCT组和MSCT组的L
B-B1
、L
C-C1
、L
AR
测量结果与实体标本组的平均绝对误差和相对误差比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
CBCT与MSCT对颧上颌骨复合体的三维重建具有等效精度,但CBCT在牙体组织等精细结构的三维重建精度方面更具优势,建议将其作为穿颧种植影像数据采集的首要选择。
Objective
2
To compare the accuracy differences of three-dimensional reconstruction of zygomatic-maxillary complex using cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) and multi-slice spiral computed tomography(MSCT)in the parameters related to zygomatic implantation.
Methods
2
Five adult skull specimens (10 zygomatic-maxillary complexes in total) were selected.According to the clinical application characteristics of zygomatic implantation,the parameter location for each skull specimen was conducted,and then CBCT and MSCT were used for scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction.Four parameters were measured on both skull specimens and reconstructed models:the thickness of the maxillary zygomatic process at the intersection of the zygomatic implant path and zygomaticomaxillary suture (L
B-B1
),the thickness of the zygomatic bone at the intersection of the zygomatic implant path and the midpoint of the zygomatic bone surface(L
C-C1
),the width of the alveolar ridge between the second premolar and the first molar (L
AR
),and the buccolingual width of the first molar (L
M
).The specimen group was measured by electronic vernier caliper, and the CBCT group and MSCT group were measured based on CBCT and MSCT. The absolute and relative errors of these four parameters were calculated,and the accuracy of the CBCT and MSCT three-dimensional reconstruction models were analyzed.
Results
2
All parameters demonstrated excellent measurement reliability and repeatability,with
intra
-
class correlation coefficient
(
ICC
)≥0.90.The measurement results of each parameter in the CBCT group and the MSCT group showed statistically significant differences compared with those in the specimen group (
P
<
0.05).The measurement result of L
M
in the CBCT group was smaller than that in the MSCT group,and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). However,th
e measurement results of L
B-B1
,L
C-C1
and L
AR
in the CBCT group showed no statistically significant difference compared with those in the MSCT group (
P
>
0.05).The mean absolute error and relative error of the L
M
measurement results to the specimen group in the CBCT group were both smaller than those in the MSCT group,and the differences were statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean absolute error or relative error of the L
B-B1
,L
C-C1
and L
AR
measurement results to the specimen group between the CBCT group and the MSCT group (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
CBCT and MSCT demonstrat comparable accuracy in three-dimensional reconstruction of the zygomatic-maxillary complex.However,CBCT exhibits superior accuracy for fine structures such as dental tissues, which is recommended as the primary choice for imaging data acquisition in zygomatic implantation.
吴迪 , 汤春波 . 穿颧种植用于上颌后部骨量不足种植修复的研究进展 [J]. 口腔医学 , 2020 , 40 ( 7 ): 639 - 643 . doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2020.07.013 http://dx.doi.org/10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2020.07.013 .
王鲲鹏 , 朱嘉琪 , 张婷婷 . 穿颧种植技术的研究进展 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志 , 2020 , 55 ( 3 ): 196 - 200 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2020.03.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2020.03.011 .
Brennand RM , Vissink A , Dudding T , et al . Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Implant Dent , 2023 , 9 ( 1 ): 21 . doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x .
Liang X , Lambrichts I , Sun Y , et al . A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT).Part Ⅱ:on 3D model accuracy [J]. Eur J Radiol , 2010 , 75 ( 2 ): 270 - 274 . doi: 1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.016 http://dx.doi.org/1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.016 .
Guyader E , Savean J , Clodic C , et al . Three-dimensional reconstruction of the temporal bone:comparison of in situ,CT,and CBCT measurements [J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis , 2018 , 135 ( 6 ): 393 - 398 . doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.08.013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2018.08.013 .
刘华蔚 , 毕文婷 , 李永锋 , 等 . 颞下颌关节骨关节病的螺旋CT和锥形束CT影像学比较观察 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志 , 2021 , 56 ( 8 ): 747 - 752 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210317-00123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210317-00123 .
Ghamri M , Dritsas K , Probst J , et al . Accuracy of facial skeletal surfaces segmented from CT and CBCT radiographs [J]. Sci Rep , 2023 , 13 ( 1 ): 21002 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48320-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48320-0 .
胡蒙 , 朱怀仕 , 宋琦 . 口腔种植定位术前评估中颌骨低剂量多层螺旋CT检查的应用 [J]. 诊断学理论与实践 , 2018 , 17 ( 1 ): 66 - 69 . doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2018.01.012 http://dx.doi.org/10.16150/j.1671-2870.2018.01.012 .
王小乐 , 李东平 , 丁水清 . MSCT及CBCT三维测量在口腔种植术中的应用 [J]. 中国医药指南 , 2017 , 15 ( 25 ): 184 - 185 . doi: 10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2017.25.149 http://dx.doi.org/10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2017.25.149 .
吴豪阳 , 霍蓓蓓 , 吴东 . CBCT三维成像在口腔种植术中的临床应用 [J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志 , 2011 , 16 ( 2 ): 125 - 127 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3957.2011.02.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3957.2011.02.010 .
Poeschl PW , Schmidt N , Guevara-Rojas G , et al . Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning [J]. Clin Oral Investig , 2013 , 17 ( 1 ): 317 - 324 . doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0704-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0704-6 .
谭智 , 沈锂 , 杨晶 , 等 . 应用多层螺旋CT测量下颌神经管解剖学位置的价值探讨 [J]. 上海口腔医学 , 2023 , 32 ( 3 ): 314 - 317 . doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.018 .
Al-Nawas B , Aghaloo T , Aparicio C , et al . ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants:indications,evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes [J]. Int J Implant Dent , 2023 , 9 ( 1 ): 28 . doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9 .
Tao B , Shen Y , Sun Y , et al . Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res , 2020 , 22 ( 6 ): 747 - 755 . doi: 10.1111/cid.12958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12958 .
Hofmann E , Schmid M , Sedlmair M , et al . Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography:an in-vitro investigation [J]. Clin Oral Investig , 2014 , 18 ( 1 ): 301 - 311 . doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0948-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0948-9 .
Nardi C , Talamonti C , Pallotta S , et al . Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality:a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol , 2017 , 46 ( 7 ): 20170030 . doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170030 .
Chen LC , Lundgren T , Hallstrom H , et al . Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement [J]. J Periodontol , 2008 , 79 ( 3 ): 401 - 405 . doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070021 .
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
