Hemostatic materials in wound care
- Burns & Trauma Vol. 9, Issue 1, (2021)
- 作者机构：
1. Department of Biosystems Engineering
2. University of Manitoba
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.1093/burnst/tkab019
CLC：Published：2021，
Published Online：15 September 2021，
扫 描 看 全 文
Peiyu Yu, Wen Zhong, Hemostatic materials in wound care, Burns & Trauma, Volume 9, 2021, tkab019, https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab019
摘要
Abstract
Blood plays an essential role in the human body. Hemorrhage is a critical cause of both military and civilian casualties. The human body has its own hemostatic mechanism that involves complex processes and has limited capacity. However
in emergency situations such as battlefields and hospitals
when the hemostatic mechanism of the human body itself cannot stop bleeding effectively
hemostatic materials are needed for saving lives. In this review
the hemostatic mechanisms and performance of the most commonly used hemostatic materials
(including fibrin
collagen
zeolite
gelatin
alginate
chitosan
cellulose and cyanoacrylate) and the commercial wound dressings based on these materials
will be discussed. These materials may have limitations
such as poor tissue adhesion
risk of infection and exothermic reactions
that may lessen their hemostatic efficacy and cause secondary injuries. High-performance hemostatic materials
therefore
have been designed and developed to improve hemostatic efficiency in clinical use. In this review
hemostatic materials with advanced performances
such as antibacterial capacity
superhydrophobicity/superhydrophilicity
superelasticity
high porosity and/or biomimicry
will be introduced. Future prospects of hemostatic materials will also be discussed in this review.
关键词
Keywords
HemostasisHemorrhageHemostatic materialsWound healingConventional hemostatic materialsHigh-performance hemostatic materials
references
1.Hematology.org. Hematology glossary [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hematology.org/education/patients/blood-basics
2.Behrens AM, Sikorski MJ, Kofinas P. Hemostatic strategies for traumatic and surgical bleeding. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2014;102(11):4182–94.
3.Zhao X, Guo B, Wu H, Liang Y, Ma PX. Injectable antibacterial conductive nanocomposite cryogels with rapid shape recovery for noncompressible hemorrhage and wound healing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04998-9.
4.Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2006;60(6):S3–11.
5.Hickman DSA, Pawlowski CL, Sekhon UDS, Marks J, Sen GA. Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding. Adv Mater. 2018;30(4):1700859. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700859.
6.Yang X, Liu W, Li N, Wang M, Liang B, Ullah I, et al. Design and development of polysaccharide hemostatic materials and their hemostatic mechanism. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(12):2357–68.
7.Cheng X, Shao Z, Li C, Yu L, Raja MA, Liu C. Isolation, Characterization and Evaluation of Collagen from Jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum Kishinouye for Use in Hemostatic Applications. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169731.
8.Arnaud F, Tomori T, Carr W, McKeague A, Teranishi K, Prusaczyk K, et al. Exothermic reaction in zeolite hemostatic dressings: QuikClot ACS and ACS+®. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36(10):1708–13.
9.Hajosch R, Suckfuell M, Oesser S, Ahlers M. Flechsenhar K. A novel gelatin sponge for accelerated hemostasis. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2010;94(2):372–9.
10.Thomas A, Harding KG, Moore K. Alginates from wound dressings activate human macrophages to secrete tumour necrosis factor-α. Biomaterials. 2000;21(17):1797–802.
11.Lan G, Lu B, Wang T, Wang L, Chen J, Yu K, et al. Chitosan / gelatin composite sponge is an absorbable surgical hemostatic agent. Colloids surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2015;136:1026–34.
12.Liu X, Lin T, Gao Y, Xu Z, Huang C, Yao G, et al. Antimicrobial electrospun nanofibers of cellulose acetate and polyester urethane composite for wound dressing. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater 2012;100 B(6):1556–65.
13.Jiang K, Long Y, Chen Z, Liu S, Huang Y, Jiang X, et al. Airflow-directed in situ electrospinning of a medical glue of cyanoacrylate for rapid hemostasis in liver resection. Nanoscale. 2014;6(14):7792–8.
14.Tomizawa Y. Clinical benefits and risk analysis of topical hemostats: A review. J Artif Organs. 2005;8(3):137–42.
15.Duarte AP, Coelho JF, Bordado JC, Cidade MT, Gil MH. Surgical adhesives: Systematic review of the main types and development forecast. Prog Polym Sci [Internet] 2012;37(8):1031–50. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.003.
16.Ferreira CS, AFdS C, de Abreu AP, Sartori F, Ferreira AP, da Cunha Peixoto K Jr, et al. Evaluation of Nylon Cable Ties as an Alternative Method of Preventive Hemostasis for Bovine Orchiectomy. Andrology-Open Access 2015;04(02):2–5.
17.Itoi T, Yasuda I, Doi S, Mukai T, Kurihara T, Sofuni A. Endoscopic hemostasis using covered metallic stent placement for uncontrolled post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. Endoscopy. 2011;43(4):369–72.
18.Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN. Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(1):129–31.
19.Maeda K, Maruta M, Utsumi T, Sato H, Aoyama H, Katsuno H, et al. Local correction of a transverse loop colostomy prolapse by means of a stapler device. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8(1):45–6.
20.Annabi N, Tamayol A, Shin SR, Ghaemmaghami AM, Peppas NA, Khademhosseini A. Surgical materials: Current challenges and nano-enabled solutions. Nano Today [Internet] 2014;9(5):574–89. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.006.
21.Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, Cosgriff N, Heniford TB. Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure™) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: A meta-analysis. Surg Innov. 2008;15(4):284–91.
22.Shai A, Maibach HI. Wound Healing and Ulcers of the Skin Diagnosis and Therapy–The Practical Approach. In: Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Perawatan Ortodontik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pihak Non Profesional, Vol. 53, 2005, 1689–99.
23.Dhillon S, De Boer MT, Papacharalabous EN, Schwartz M. Fibrin sealant (Evicel® [quixil®/crosseal™]): A review of its use as supportive treatment for haemostasis in surgery. Drugs. 2011;71(14):1893–915.
24.Schwartz M, Madariaga J, Hirose R, Shaver TR, Sher L, Chari R, et al. Comparison of a new fibrin sealant with standard topical hemostatic agents. Arch Surg. 2004;139(11):1148–54.
25.Pereira BM, Bortoto JB, Fraga GP. Topical hemostatic agents in surgery: review and prospects. Rev Col Bras Cir 2018;45(5):e1900.
26.The CELOX[tm] Advantage · Celox Hemostats [Internet]. Available from: https://www.celoxmedical.com/na/about-celox
27.Otrocka-Domagała I, Jastrzȩbski P, Adamiak Z, Paździor-Czapula K, Gesek M, Mikiewicz M, et al. Safety of the long-term application of QuikClot Combat Gauze, ChitoGauze PRO and Celox Gauze in a femoral artery injury model in swine - A preliminary study. Pol J Vet Sci. 2016;19(2):337–43.
28.Product Introduction: The HemCon Bandage | Cath Lab Digest [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cathlabdigest.com/articles/Product-Introduction-The-HemCon-Bandage
29.Granville-Chapman J, Jacobs N, Midwinter MJ. Pre-hospital haemostatic dressings: A systematic review. Injury [Internet] 2011;42(5):447–59. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.037.
30.Rousou JA, Engelman RM, Breyer RH. Fibrin Glue: An Effective Hemostatic Agent for Nonsuturable Intraoperative Bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet] 1984;38(4):409–10. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62297-7.
31.Raccuia JS, Simonian G, Dardik M, Hallac D, Raccuia SV, Stahl R, et al. Comparative efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in a rat kidney model. Am J Surg. 1992;163(2):234–8.
32.Delgado AV, Kheirabadi BS, Fruchterman TM, Scherer M, Cortez D, Wade CE, et al. A Novel Biologic Hemostatic Dressing (Fibrin Patch) Reduces Blood Loss and Resuscitation Volume and Improves Survival in Hypothermic, Coagulopathic Swine With Grade V Liver Injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2008;64(1):75–80.
33.Krishnan LK, Mohanty M, Umashankar PR. Lal AV. Comparative evaluation of absorbable hemostats: advantages of fibrin-based sheets. 2004;25:5557–63.
34.Wheat JC, Wolf JS. Advances in Bioadhesives, Tissue Sealants, and Hemostatic Agents. Urol Clin North Am [Internet] 2009;36(2):265–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.02.002.
35.Li G, Quan K, Xu CC, Deng B, Wang X. Synergy in thrombin-graphene sponge for improved hemostatic efficacy and facile utilization. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces [Internet] 2018;161:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.021.
36.Rothwell SW, Settle T, Wallace S, Dorsey J, Simpson D, Bowman JR, et al. The long term immunological response of swine after two exposures to a salmon thrombin and fibrinogen hemostatic bandage. Biologicals [Internet] 2010;38(6):619–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.07.001.
37.Prockop DJ. Collagens: Molecular Biology, Diseases, and Potentials for Therapy. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64(1):403–34.
38.Morgenstern L. Microcrystalline Collagen Used in Experimental Splenic Injury. Arch Surg. 1974;109(1):44–7.
39.Liang Y, Xu C, Li G, Liu T, Liang JF, Wang X. Graphene-kaolin composite sponge for rapid and riskless hemostasis. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces [Internet] 2018;169(April 2008):168–75. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.016.
40.Li J, Cao W, Lv XX, Jiang L, Li YJ, Li WZ, et al. Zeolite-based hemostat QuikClot releases calcium into blood and promotes blood coagulation in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34(3):367–72.
41.Alam HB, Chen Z, Jaskille A, Querol RILC, Koustova E, Inocencio R, et al. Application of a zeolite hemostatic agent achieves 100% survival in a lethal model of complex groin injury in swine. J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care 2004;56(5):974–83.
42.Pusateri AE, Delgado AV, Dick EJ, Martinez RS, Holcomb JB, Ryan KL. Application of a granular mineral-based hemostatic agent (QuikClot) to reduce blood loss after grade V liver injury in swine. J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care 2004;57(3):555–62.
43.Li Y, Li H, Xiao L, Zhou L, Shentu J, Zhang X, et al. Hemostatic Efficiency and Wound Healing Properties of Natural Zeolite Granules in a Lethal Rabbit Model of Complex Groin Injury. Materials. 2012;5(12):2586–96.
44.Juliana Bergamasco L, Zazeri G, Paula A, Povinelli R, Fernandes M, Godoy D, et al. Enhanced pro-coagulant hemostatic agents based on nanometric zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017;239:263–71.
45.Sun X, Tang Z, Pan M, Wang Z, Yang H, Liu H. Chitosan/kaolin composite porous microspheres with high hemostatic efficacy. Carbohydr Polym [Internet] 2017;177(August):135–43. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.131.
46.Fan L, Yang H, Yang J, Peng M, Hu J. Preparation and characterization of chitosan / gelatin / PVA hydrogel for wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym [Internet] 2016;146:427–34. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.002.
47.Djagny KB, Wang Z, Xu S, Djagny KB, Wang Z, Xu S. Gelatin: A Valuable Protein for Food and Pharmaceutical Industries: Review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ISSN. 2010;8398:481–92.
48.Liu Y, Kopelman D, Wu LQ, Hijji K, Attar I, Preiss-Bloom O, et al. Biomimetic sealant based on gelatin and microbial transglutaminase: An initial in vivo investigation. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater 2009;91(1):5–16.
49.Cheng F, Liu C, Wei X, Yan T, Li H, He J, et al. Preparation and Characterization of 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-Oxidized Cellulose Nanocrystal/Alginate Biodegradable Composite Dressing for Hemostasis Applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5(5):3819–28.
50.Hu Z, Zhang DY, Lu ST, Li PW, Li SD. Chitosan-based composite materials for prospective hemostatic applications. Mar Drugs. 2018;16(8):273. doi: 10.3390/md16080273.
51.di Lena F. Hemostatic polymers: the concept, state of the art and perspectives. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(23):3567–77.
52.Janvikul W, Uppanan P, Thavornyutikarn B, Krewraing J, Prateepasen R. In vitro comparative hemostatic studies of chitin, chitosan, and their derivatives. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;102(1):445–51.
53.Koumentakou I, Terzopoulou Z, Michopoulou A, Kalafatakis I, Theodorakis K, Tzetzis D, et al. Chitosan dressings containing inorganic additives and levofloxacin as potential wound care products with enhanced hemostatic properties. Int J Biol Macromol Internet 2020;162:693–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.187.
54.Maevskaia EN, Shabunin AS, Dresvyanina EN, Dobrovol’skaya IP, Yudin VE, Paneyah MB, et al. Influence of the introduced chitin nanofibrils on biomedical properties of chitosan-based materials. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(5):945.
55.Françon H, Wang Z, Marais A, Mystek K, Piper A, Granberg H, et al. Ambient-Dried, 3D-Printable and Electrically Conducting Cellulose Nanofiber Aerogels by Inclusion of Functional Polymers. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(12):1909383.
56.Basu A, Hong J, Ferraz N. Hemocompatibility of Ca2+-Crosslinked Nanocellulose Hydrogels: Toward Efficient Management of Hemostasis. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17(11):1700236.
57.Spazierer KMLD, Lin MDUL, Goppelt HRA. Comparison of regenerated and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose hemostatic agents. Eur Surg. 2013;45(4):213–20.
58.Eggat PEAL, Mith DERS, URK E. Surgical applications of cyanoacrylate adhesives: a review of toxicity. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(4):209–13.
59.Emilia M, Luca S, Francesca B, Luca B, Paolo S, Giuseppe F, et al. Topical hemostatic agents in surgical practice. Transfus Apher Sci. 2011;45(3):305–11.
60.Spotnitz WD, Burks S. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: Components of the surgical toolbox. Transfusion. 2008;48(7):1502–16.
61.Gordy SD, Rhee P, Schreiber MA. Military applications of novel hemostatic devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011;8(1):41–7.
62.Sundaram CP, Keenan AC. Evolution of hemostatic agents in surgical practice. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(3):374–8.
63.Vyas KS, Saha SP. Comparison of hemostatic agents used in vascular surgery. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(12):1663–72.
64.Ibrahim NA, Abo-Shosha MH, Gaffar MA, Elshafei AM, Abdel-Fatah OM. Antibacterial properties of ester - Cross-linked cellulose-containing fabrics post-treated with metal salts. Polym - Plast Technol Eng. 2006;45(6):719–27.
65.Shin JU, Gwon J, Lee SY, Yoo HS. Silver-Incorporated Nanocellulose Fibers for Antibacterial Hydrogels. ACS Omega. 2018;3(11):16150–7.
66.Shi G, Wang Y, Derakhshanfar S, Xu K, Zhong W, Luo G, et al. Biomimicry of oil infused layer on 3D printed poly(dimethylsiloxane): Non-fouling, antibacterial and promoting infected wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet]. 2019;100(November 2017):915–27. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.058.
67.Liu T, Liu Y, Liu M, Wang Y, He W, Shi G, et al. Synthesis of graphene oxide-quaternary ammonium nanocomposite with synergistic antibacterial activity to promote infected wound healing. Burn Trauma. 2018;6(1):16–16. doi: 10.1186/s41038-018-0115-2.
68.Ding B, Wu F, Chen S, Wang Y, Zeng J. Synthesis and characterization of polyurethane ionene/zinc chloride complex with antibacterial property. RSC Advances [Internet]. 2015;5(16):12423–33. http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C5TC02043C
69.Fajardo AR, Lopes LC, Caleare AO, Britta EA, Nakamura CV, Rubira AF, et al. Silver sulfadiazine loaded chitosan/chondroitin sulfate films for a potential wound dressing application. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet] 2013;33(2):588–95. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.09.025.
70.Li H, Cheng F, Gao S, Wu Z, Dong L, Lin S, et al. Preparation, characterization, antibacterial properties, and hemostatic evaluation of ibuprofen-loaded chitosan/gelatin composite films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134(42):45441. doi: 10.1002/app.45441.
71.Du WL, Niu SS, Xu YL, Xu ZR, Fan CL. Antibacterial activity of chitosan tripolyphosphate nanoparticles loaded with various metal ions. Carbohydr Polym [Internet] 2009;75(3):385–9. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.039.
72.Hou Y, Xia Y, Pan Y, Tang S, Sun X, Xie Y, et al. Influences of mesoporous zinc-calcium silicate on water absorption, degradability, antibacterial efficacy, hemostatic performances and cell viability to microporous starch based hemostat. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet] 2017;76:340–9. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.094.
73.Vaidya MY, McBain AJ, Butler JA, Banks CE, Whitehead KA. Antimicrobial Efficacy and Synergy of Metal Ions against Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii in Planktonic and Biofilm Phenotypes. Sci Rep [Internet] 2017;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05976-9.
74.Kang J, Dietz MJ, Hughes K, Xing M, Li B. Silver nanoparticles present high intracellular and extracellular killing against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(6):1578–85.
75.Liu M, Wang Y, Hu X, He W, Gong Y, Hu X, et al. Janus N,N-dimethylformamide as a solvent for a gradient porous wound dressing of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and as a reducer for in situ nano-silver production: anti-permeation, antibacterial and antifouling activities against multi-drug-resistant bacteria. RSC Adv. 2018;8(47):26626–39.
76.Chen G, Yu Y, Wu X, Wang G, Gu G, Wang F, et al. Microfluidic Electrospray Niacin Metal-Organic Frameworks Encapsulated Microcapsules for Wound Healing. Research. 2019;2019:1–11. doi: 10.34133/2019/6175398.
77.Xie T, Ding J, Han X, Jia H, Yang Y, Liang S, et al. Wound dressing change facilitated by spraying zinc ions. Mater Horizons [Internet] 2020;7(2):605–14. doi: 10.1039/C9MH01255A.
78.Bi D. Antibacterial hemostatic dressings with nanoporous bioglass containing silver. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2613.
79.Pourshahrestani S, Zeimaran E, Kadri A, Gargiulo N, Towler MR. Gallium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass with potent hemostatic activity and antibacterial efficacy. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4(1):71–86.
80.Guo-dong F, Fang Y, Zhigang L, Xinsong L. Solvent-resistant antibacterial microfibers of self-quaternized block copolymers from atom transfer radical polymerization and electrospinning. J Mater Chem B. 2008;18(8):859–67.
81.Spasova M, Manolova N, Paneva D, Mincheva R, Dubois P, Rashkov I, et al. Polylactide stereocomplex-based electrospun materials possessing surface with antibacterial and hemostatic properties. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(1):151–9.
82.Demirekin ZB, Sezer UA, Karatopuk DU, Sezer S. Development of Metal Ion Binded Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Powder as Hemostatic Agent: A Comparative Study with in Vivo Performance. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;54(18):4906–14.
83.He JM, Wu YD, Wang FW, Cheng WL, Huang YD, Fu B. Hemostatic, antibacterial and degradable performance of the water-soluble chitosan-coated oxidized regenerated cellulose gauze. Fibers Polym. 2014;15(3):504–9.
84.Drelich J, Chibowski E. Superhydrophilic and superwetting surfaces: Definition and mechanisms of control. Langmuir. 2010;26(24):18621–3.
85.Lavieja C, Oriol L, Peña JI. Creation of superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic surfaces on ABS employing a nanosecond laser. Materials. 2018;11(12):2547.
86.Si Y, Dong Z, Jiang L. Bioinspired Designs of Superhydrophobic and Superhydrophilic Materials. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4(9):1102–12.
87.Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta. 1997;202(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s004250050096.
88.Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Li H, Zhang L, Zhai J, et al. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv Mater. 2002;14(24):1857–60.
89.Liu M, Wang S, Wei Z, Song Y, Jiang L. Bioinspired design of a superoleophobic and low adhesive water/solid interface. Adv Mater. 2009;21(6):665–9.
90.Roach P, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI. Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter. 2008;4(2):224.
91.Ueda E, Levkin PA. Emerging applications of superhydrophilic-superhydrophobic micropatterns. Adv Mater. 2013;25(9):1234–47.
92.Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu M, Qian W, Zhou D, Liu T, et al. Short fluorocarbon chains containing hydrophobic nanofibrous membranes with improved hemocompatibility, anticoagulation and anti-fouling performance. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces [Internet]. 2019;180(April 2018):49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.01.025.
93.Fischer M, Sperling C, Werner C. Synergistic effect of hydrophobic and anionic surface groups triggers blood coagulation in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(3):931–7.
94.Zhu T, Wu J, Zhao N, Cai C, Qian Z, Si F, et al. Superhydrophobic/Superhydrophilic Janus Fabrics Reducing Blood Loss. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(7):1–7. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701086.
95.Cui C, Fan C, Wu Y, Xiao M, Wu T, Zhang D, et al. Water-Triggered Hyperbranched Polymer Universal Adhesives: From Strong Underwater Adhesion to Rapid Sealing Hemostasis. Adv Mater. 2019;31(49):1–9. doi: 10.1002/adma.201905761.
96.Li Z, Milionis A, Zheng Y, Yee M, Codispoti L, Tan F, et al. Superhydrophobic hemostatic nanofiber composites for fast clotting and minimal adhesion. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–11.
97.Dowling MB, Kumar R, Keibler MA, Hess JR, Bochicchio GV, Raghavan SR. A self-assembling hydrophobically modified chitosan capable of reversible hemostatic action. Biomaterials [Internet] 2011;32(13):3351–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.033.
98.Aizenberg J, Fratzl P. Biological and biomimetic materials. Adv Mater. 2009;21(4):387–8.
99.Fratzl P. Biomimetic materials research: What can we really learn from nature’s structural materials? J R Soc Interface. 2007;4(15):637–42.
100.Ma PX. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(2):184–98.
101.Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24(24):4353–64.
102.Silvestri A, Boffito M, Sartori S, Ciardelli G. Biomimetic materials and scaffolds for myocardial tissue regeneration. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13(8):984–1019.
103.Spinks GM. Advanced Actuator Materials Powered by Biomimetic Helical Fiber Topologies. Adv Mater. 2019;1904093:1–13. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904093.
104.Liu G, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Xu J, Xu J, Li Y, et al. Engineering Biomimetic Platesomes for pH-Responsive Drug Delivery and Enhanced Antitumor Activity. Adv Mater. 2019;31(32):1–12. doi: 10.1002/adma.201900795.
105.Jiang J, Huang Y, Wang Y, Xu H, Xing M, Zhong W. Mussel-inspired dopamine and carbon nanotube leading to a biocompatible self-rolling conductive hydrogel film. Materials. 2017;10(8):964.
106.Majumder A, Sharma A, Ghatak A. A bioinspired wet/dry microfluidic adhesive for aqueous environments. Langmuir. 2010;26(1):521–5.
107.Kamino K. Underwater adhesive of marine organisms as the vital link between biological science and material science. Mar Biotechnol. 200810(2):111–21.
108.Liu C, Yao W, Tian M, Wei J, Song Q, Qiao W. Mussel-inspired degradable antibacterial polydopamine / silica nanoparticle for rapid hemostasis. Biomaterials [Internet] 2018;179:83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.037.
109.Akdogan Y, Wei W, Huang KY, Kageyama Y, Danner EW, Miller DR, et al. Intrinsic Surface-Drying Properties of Bioadhesive Proteins. Angew Chemie - Int Ed. 2014;53(42):11253–6.
110.Lu D, Wang H, Wang X, Li Y, Guo H, Sun S, et al. Biomimetic chitosan-graft-polypeptides for improved adhesion in tissue and metal. Carbohydr Polym Internet 2019;215:20–8. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.065.
111.Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST, Zesch W, Chan WP, Kenny TW, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature. 2000;405(6787):681–5.
112.Mahdavi A, Ferreira L, Sundback C, Nichol JW, Chan EP, Carter DJD, et al. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(7):2307–12.
113.Moorleghem W Van, Chandrasekaran M, Reynaerts D, Peirs J, Brussel H Van. Shape memory and superelastic alloys: The new medical materials with growing demand. Biomed Mater Eng. 1998;8:55–60.
114.Qiu L, Liu JZ, Chang SLY, Wu Y, Li D. Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2251.
115.Talyzin AV, Dubrovinsky LS, Oden M, Jansson U. Superhard and superelastic films of polymeric C60. Diam Relat Mater. 2001;10(11):2044–8.
116.Auriemma F, De Rosa C, Esposito S, Mitchell GR. Polymorphic superelasticity in semicrystalline polymers. Angew Chemie - Int Ed. 2007;46(23):4325–8.
117.Yu ZL, Qin B, Ma ZY, Huang J, Li SC, Zhao HY, et al. Superelastic hard carbon nanofiber aerogels. Adv Mater. 2019;31(23):1900651. doi: 10.1002/adma.201970168.
118.Li C, Ding Y, Hu B, Wu Z, Gao H, Liang H, et al. Temperature-Invariant Superelastic and Fatigue Resistant Carbon Nanofiber Aerogels. Adv Mater. 2020;32(2):1904331. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904331
119.Li Y, Cao L, Yin X, Si Y, Yu J, Ding B. Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Network Biomimetic Structure Enables Superelastic and Thermostable Nanofibrous Aerogels for Cascade Filtration of PM2.5. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(14):1–11. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201910426.
120.Zhang Z, Deng J, Li X, Yang Z, He S, Chen X, et al. Superelastic Supercapacitors with High Performances during Stretching. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;27(2):356–62.
121.Mathieu L, Bazile F, Barthélémy R, Duhamel P, Rigal S. Damage control orthopaedics in the context of battlefield injuries : The use of temporary external fixation on combat trauma soldiers, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2011;97(8):852–9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.05.014.
122.Fan X, Li Y, Li X, Wu Y, Tang K, Liu J, et al. Injectable antibacterial cellulose nanofiber/chitosan aerogel with rapid shape recovery for noncompressible hemorrhage. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet] 2020;154:1185–93.
123.Li S, Wang L, Zheng W, Yang G, Jiang X. Rapid Fabrication of Self-Healing, Conductive, and Injectable Gel as Dressings for Healing Wounds in Stretchable Parts of the Body. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(31):2002370.
124.Zhao X, Wu H, Guo B, Dong R, Qiu Y, Ma PX. Antibacterial anti-oxidant electroactive injectable hydrogel as self-healing wound dressing with hemostasis and adhesiveness for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials [Internet] 2017;122:34–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.011.
125.Jang LK, Fletcher GK, Monroe MB, Maitland DJ. Maitland DJ. Biodegradable shape memory polymer foams with appropriate thermal properties for hemostatic applications J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(6):1281–94.
126.Françon H, Wang Z, Marais A, Mystek K, Piper A, Granberg H, et al. Ambient-Dried, 3D-Printable and Electrically Conducting Cellulose Nanofiber Aerogels by Inclusion of Functional Polymers. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(12):1909383.
127.Wang D, Peng H, Yu B, Zhou K, Pan H, Zhang L, et al. Biomimetic structural cellulose nanofiber aerogels with exceptional mechanical, flame-retardant and thermal-insulating properties. Chem Eng J 2020;389:124449.
128.De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED. Review of Hydrogels and Aerogels Containing Nanocellulose. Chem Mater. 2017;29(11):4609–31.
129.Maleki H, Durães L, Portugal A. An overview on silica aerogels synthesis and different mechanical reinforcing strategies. J Non Cryst Solids [Internet] 2014;385:55–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.10.017.
130.Cui Y, Wang Y, Shao Z, Mao A, Gao W, Bai H. Smart Sponge for Fast Liquid Absorption and Thermal Responsive Self-Squeezing. Adv Mater. 2020;32(14):1–9. doi: 10.1002/adma.201908249.
131.Heath L, Thielemans W. Cellulose nanowhisker aerogels. Green Chem. 2010;12(8):1448–53.
132.Sun H, Xu Z, Gao C. Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv Mater. 2013;25(18):2554–60.
133.Shao G, Hanaor DAH, Shen X, Gurlo A. Freeze Casting: From Low-Dimensional Building Blocks to Aligned Porous Structures—A Review of Novel Materials, Methods, and Applications. Adv Mater. 2020;32(17):1907176.
134.Biener J, Stadermann M, Suss M, Worsley MA, Biener MM, Rose KA, et al. Advanced carbon aerogels for energy applications. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4(3):656–67.
135.García-González CA, Alnaief M, Smirnova I. Polysaccharide-based aerogels - Promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86(4):1425–38.
136.Wang L, Zhang X, He Y, Wang Y, Zhong W, Mequanint K, et al. Ultralight Conductive and Elastic Aerogel for Skeletal Muscle Atrophy Regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(1):1–17. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201806200.
137.Zhang Q, Zhang F, Medarametla SP, Li H, Zhou C, Lin D. 3D Printing of Graphene Aerogels. Small. 2016;12(13):1702–8.
138.Hutchinson RW, George K, Johns D, Craven L, Zhang G, Shnoda P. Hemostatic efficacy and tissue reaction of oxidized regenerated cellulose hemostats. Cellulose. 2013;20(1):537–45.
139.Mellado C, Figueroa T, Báez R, Castillo R, Melendrez M, Schulz B, et al. Development of graphene oxide composite aerogel with proanthocyanidins with hemostatic properties as a delivery system. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(9):7717–29.
140.Lu T, Li Q, Chen W, Yu H. Composite aerogels based on dialdehyde nanocellulose and collagen for potential applications as wound dressing and tissue engineering scaffold. Compos Sci Technol [Internet] 2014;94:132–8. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.020.
141.Vlieghe P, Lisowski V, Martinez J, Khrestchatisky M, Khrestchatisky M. Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15(1–2):40–56.
142.Bahar AA, Ren D. Antimicrobial peptides. Pharmaceuticals. 2013;6(12):1543–75.
143.Zhang S, Marini DM, Hwang W, Santoso S. Design of nanostructured biological materials through self-assembly of peptides and proteins. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002;6(6):865–71.
144.Ellis-behnke R. At the nanoscale: nanohemostat, a new class of hemostatic agent. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 20113(1):70–8.
145.Hsu BB, Conway W, Tschabrunn CM, Mehta M, Perez-Cuevas MB, Zhang S, et al. Clotting Mimicry from Robust Hemostatic Bandages Based on Self-Assembling Peptides. ACS Nano. 2015;9(9):9394–406.
146.Song H, Zhang L, Zhao X. Hemostatic Efficacy of Biological Self- Assembling Peptide Nanofibers in a Rat Kidney Model. 2010;33–9.
147.Kumar VA, Taylor NL, Jalan AA, Hwang LK, Wang BK, Hartgerink JD. A nanostructured synthetic collagen mimic for hemostasis. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(4):1484–90.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- L-PDFDownload
- Meta-XMLDownload
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
- Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
- Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.
