Comparison of histopathological staining methods for Cryptococcus neoforman
|更新时间:2025-01-15
|
Comparison of histopathological staining methods for Cryptococcus neoforman
Journal of Army Medical UniversityVol. 31, Issue 17, Pages: 1685-1686(2009)
作者机构:
第三军医大学西南医院病理学研究所
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R372;R379.5;R446.5
Published:2009,
Published Online:15 September 2009,
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
XIN RONG, GUO DE-YU. Comparison of histopathological staining methods for Cryptococcus neoforman. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2009, 31(17): 1685-1686.
DOI:
XIN RONG, GUO DE-YU. Comparison of histopathological staining methods for Cryptococcus neoforman. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2009, 31(17): 1685-1686.DOI:
Comparison of histopathological staining methods for Cryptococcus neoforman
Objective To compare several histopathological staining methods in demonstrating
Cryptococcus neoforman
. Methods Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) method
periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) method
Alcian blue method and Grocott-Gomori’s methenamine silver method were carried out in the lung and brain tissue samples from 7 autoptical cases identified with
Cryptococcus neoforman
infection. Results All these methods demonstrated
Cryptococcus neoforman
infection
HE method showed unclear pink cell body which were difficult to be found. Alcian blue method displayed blue picture
and PAS method showed violet-red body
and Grocott-Gomori’s methenamine silver method presented clear dark black picture which was easy to be distinguished from other components. Conclusion Grocott-Gomor
i’s methenamine silver method is the best method in staining