18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary lesions with atypical manifestation: based on 13 misdiagnosed cases
|更新时间:2025-01-15
|
18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary lesions with atypical manifestation: based on 13 misdiagnosed cases
Journal of Army Medical UniversityVol. 33, Issue 24, Pages: 2617-2620(2011)
作者机构:
第三军医大学西南医院放射科
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R814.42;R816.41
Published:2011,
Published Online:30 December 2011,
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
ZHANG YONGKE, CHEN WEI, CAI PING, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary lesions with atypical manifestation: based on 13 misdiagnosed cases. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2011, 33(24): 2617-2620.
DOI:
ZHANG YONGKE, CHEN WEI, CAI PING, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary lesions with atypical manifestation: based on 13 misdiagnosed cases. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2011, 33(24): 2617-2620.DOI:
18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary lesions with atypical manifestation: based on 13 misdiagnosed cases
F-FDG PET/CT表现为肺内孤立性结节影3例,片状稍高密度影1例,肺内孤立性结节表现为边缘光滑2例,病灶边缘浅分叶1例,胸膜粘连2例; SUV
max
1.9~4.2,片状稍高密度灶SUV值仅为1.9;结节直径为1.5~2.4 cm
平均2.0 cm;
18
-FDG PET/CT诊断为炎性假瘤2例,结核瘤1例,局灶性炎症1例。9例良性病变均表现为肺内孤立结节,边缘光滑3例,与胸膜粘连3例,病灶边缘浅分叶4例,病灶内出现钙化点2例; SUV
max
2.8~5.1;结节直径为1.8~3.2 cm
平均2.4 cm;
18
-FDG PET/CT均诊断为周围型肺癌。 结论 在
18
F-FDG PET/CT全身显像中
肺部非典型性表现病变缺乏常规良恶性病变的诊断特点
应密切结合临床及其他检查综合分析,避免漏诊及误诊。
Abstract
Objective To determine the diagnostic value of
18
F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary atypical manifestation in order to improve the diagnostic accuracy for such type of diseases. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 13 cases with pulmonary lesions who received
18
F-FDG PET/CT from Jan 2009 to Jun 2011 in our department
but were gi
ven wrong diagnosis. These lesions included 4 malignant tumors (3 bronchiolovalveolar carcinomas and 1 papillary adenoma)
and 9 benign lesions (2 inflammatory pseudotumors and 7 tuberculomas) according the results of needle biopsy or post-operation pathology. Results In 4 malignancies
18
F-FDG PET/CT presented solitary pulmonary nodules in 3 cases (2 lesions were with smooth margin and 1 with slight lobulation in the edge
and there were 2 cases had pleural adhesion)
and patchy higher density shadow in 1 case. SUV
max
ranged from 1.9 to 4.2
while that of the patchy shadow was only 1.9. Nodule diameter was from 1.5 to 2.4 cm
with an average of 2.0 cm.
18
F-FDG PET/CT misdiagnosed these 4 malignant tumors as 2 inflammatory pseudotumors
1 tuberculoma and 1 focal inflammation. All benign cases were solitary pulmonary nodules displayed by
18
F-FDG PET/CT
of which 3 with smooth margin
3 pleural adhesion
4 slight lobulation in the edge and 2 calcification in lesion. Their SUV
max
was 2.8 to 5.1 and nodule diameter was 1.8 to 3.2 cm with 2.4 cm in average. These were all misdiagnosed as peripheral lung cancer by
18
F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion In
18
F-FDG PET/CT whole body imaging
pulmonary atypical manifestations lack conventional features for differential diagnosis. Clinical data and other auxiliary examinations should be carefully considered to avoid errors in diagnosis.