Diagnostic value of MICM classification for myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical report of 248 patients
|更新时间:2025-01-15
|
Diagnostic value of MICM classification for myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical report of 248 patients
Journal of Army Medical UniversityVol. 36, Issue 11, Pages: 1208-1212(2014)
作者机构:
第三军医大学西南医院:预防保健科,血液病中心
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R446;R442.8;R551.3
Published:2014,
Published Online:15 June 2014,
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIU LING, YANG ZAILIN, CHEN JIEPING, et al. Diagnostic value of MICM classification for myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical report of 248 patients. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2014, 36(11): 1208-1212.
DOI:
LIU LING, YANG ZAILIN, CHEN JIEPING, et al. Diagnostic value of MICM classification for myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical report of 248 patients. [J]. Journal of army medical university, 2014, 36(11): 1208-1212.DOI:
Diagnostic value of MICM classification for myelodysplastic syndrome: a clinical report of 248 patients
Objective To determine the potential diagnostic value for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) by combining the following methods: bone marrow smear
biopsy
chromosome banding analysis
flow cytometry (FCM)
and fluorescence
in situ
hybridization (FISH)
namely MICM classification. Methods All MDS patients admitted in our hospital
from October 2010 to November 2013 were retrospectively analyzed
and those diagnosed as MDS according to the criteria formulated by WHO were enrolled in this study. Diagnostic compliance rate was analyzed by comparing the gold standard of diagnosis by WHO criteria with single test (bone marrow smear)
double test (bone marrow smear plus biopsy)
triple test (above 2 plus chromosome banding analysis)
test (above 3 plus FISH)
and quintuple test (above 4 plus FCM) respectively. The diagnostic value of MICM classification on subtype identification and prognosis assessment were also evaluated. Results Among the 248 patients with confirmed MDS
the diagnostic compliance rate was 79.44%
87.10%
88.71% and 93.15% respectively for double
triple
quadruple and quintuplet tests
and all of these were significantly higher than using bone marrow smear alone (59.27%
all
P
<
0.05). Quintuplet test also had significant value in the reticulin fibrosis and its severity
chromosomal karyotypes and its complexity
antigen expression and aberrant immunophenotype. Conclusion Our quintuplet test not only contributes to more precise and reliable diagnosis of MDS
but also benefits accurate identification of MDS subsets and prognosis assessment. So this combined diagnostic methods should be applied to routine clinical testing for MDS.