Objective In order to understand the identity of medical students for the standardized training for specialists
and provide theoretical support and policy reference for it. Methods Using the method of stratified sampling and quota sampling
2 367 medical students were selected from 17 universities in 7 administrative regions of the country to carry out anonymous electronic questionnaire survey. The results were analyzed by SPSS 19.0
with methods of mean comparison
ratio constituent and Chi-square test. Results In the survey
only 231 samples had a good understanding of specialist training for specialists
which accounted for 9.8%. And there were statistical differences between different types of medical students ( χ2=40.5
P<0.05) and different administrative areas ( χ2=33.7
P<0.05). 17.0% of the samples have shown that they would take participate in the special training system initiatively; 641 samples (22.9%) had a positive attitude towards the system
and 782 samples (33%) did not. The main reasons for non-support included low treatment (71.8%)
long training time for becoming a doctor (87.7%) and the difficulty of ensuring the training quality (59.1%). Conclusion The research can shed some lights on standardized training for specialists including establishing a network communication platform to improve the efficiency
increasing financial investment
setting up a mechanism to link the capital input to training quality to ensure the treatment of trainees
exploring the training mode of combining standardization training and doctorate training to shorten the training period
reforming the personnel system and incorporating specialists training system into the promotion conditions of professional titles.
关键词
专科医师规范化培训 认同感 对策
Keywords
Standardized training for specialists Sense of identity Countermeasure
Analysis of general practitioner system in the UK and its enlightenment
Study on the present situation, influencing factors and countermeasures of residents' body donation in China
A preliminary study on index system construction of the merging reform of doctoral degree education in clinical medicine with the standardized training of specialists