A research on the methods of establishing both domestic and foreign standards of physician qualification examination

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A research on the methods of establishing both domestic and foreign standards of physician qualification examination

更新时间：2024-09-19

- A research on the methods of establishing both domestic and foreign standards of physician qualification examination
- Vol. 14, Issue 3, Pages: 217-220(2015)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2015，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
A research on the methods of establishing both domestic and foreign standards of physician qualification examination. [J]. 14(3):217-220(2015)
DOI：

A research on the methods of establishing both domestic and foreign standards of physician qualification examination. [J]. 14(3):217-220(2015) DOI：

摘要

自实施执业医师资格考试以来，其通过标准的设定方法一直备受争议。本研究介绍Angoff法、Modified Angoff法、Nedelsky法、Borderline Group法四种当今国内外比较常用的方法，概述其优缺点及其在各国执业医师资格考试通过标准设定过程中的使用情况，以期为中国的执业医师资格考试合格分数线的设定提供借鉴和参考

Abstract

Since the examination of doctor's qualifications came into effect

methods that are set by standard to judge whether one passes the examination or not were in dispute all the while. This article is going to introduce four kinds of methods(Angoff method、Modified Angoff method、Nedelsky method、Borderline group method) which are commonly used at home and abroad. Summarizing their advantages

disadvantages and the usage in the process of standards setting in various countries

we aim to provide reference for setting cutoff score of the examination of doctor's qualifications in China.

关键词

执业医师资格考试　合格分数线　Angoff法　Nedelsky法　Borderline Ｇroup法

Keywords

Examination of doctors' qualifications　Cutoff score　Angoff method　Nedel-sky method　Borderline group method

references

Views

255

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰