Research on the different evaluation from the three parties of the clinical practice medical students’ communication ability in OSCE
|更新时间:2024-09-19
|
Research on the different evaluation from the three parties of the clinical practice medical students’ communication ability in OSCE
Vol. 16, Issue 1, (2017)
作者机构:
1. 第三军医大学第三附属医院护理学教研室
2. 第三军医大学第三附属医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2017,
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
Research on the different evaluation from the three parties of the clinical practice medical students’ communication ability in OSCE. [J]. 16(1).(2017)
DOI:
Research on the different evaluation from the three parties of the clinical practice medical students’ communication ability in OSCE. [J]. 16(1).(2017)DOI:
Research on the different evaluation from the three parties of the clinical practice medical students’ communication ability in OSCE
Abstract [Objective] to analyze the difference and correlation of the evaluation of the medical students' communication ability between the examiners
SP and medical students themselves in objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)
and to provide scientific basis for the appropriate evaluation method of medical students' communication ability. [Methods] OSCE was used to evaluate the communication ability of 90 medical students in Daping Hospital
Chongqing
and the three parties was evaluated by the examiners
SP and medical students themselves . Using Excel and SPSS17.0 statistical analysis software
through Friendman M test
T test and correlation analysis to analysis the differences and correlation of the three parties evaluations. [Results] the different evaluation between the three parties on the communication ability of medical students: Examiner' s evaluation is the lowest (mean 8.39 ± 1.18)
SP's evaluation is the highest (mean 9.62 ± 0.73)
Medical students themselves' is higher (mean9.28±1.09 );The examiner's evaluation of Medical students' empathy
verbal communication ability
nonverbal communication ability and etiquette is lower (P=0.00). The correlation analysis of the three parties' evaluation shows: There was a significant correlation between the three parties on the communication ability
empathy and non verbal communication ability (P < 0.05). The evaluation of SP and medical students themselves on medical students' language communication ability and etiquette was significantly correlated (P < 0.05). [Conclusions] Only use examiner or SP or medical students themselves to evaluate the communication ability of medical students is not accurate
The Examiner and SP as the main trial test personnel should collaborate to evaluate medical students' communication ability. The examiner evaluated the three projects what is medical ethics and law
empathy
non verbal communication ability
the SP evaluated the two projects what is language communication ability and etiquette
Collaborative evaluation of the two sides can be more accurate to reflect the communication ability of medical students’.
A research on the competitive attitude of medical students: from the perspective of professionalism
Objective structured clinical examination-based annual assessment design and feedback
Application of "Internet +" based case teaching method combined with OSCE teaching method in the teaching of nursing students in the department of nephrology
Exploration and practice of scenario-based onsite first-aid skills station in objective structured clinical examination
Investigation on major cognition and major choice motivation of medical freshmen
Related Author
Huang Tongxin
Chen Danyan
Ji Xinxin
Chen Yiting
Fang Yanjun
Wang Yujia
Jiao Liping
Zhang Jing
Related Institution
Shantou University Medicine College, Five2019-Year Clinical Medicine Professional Orientation Class
Shantou University Medicine College, Four2018-year Nursing Major
Department of Social Sciences, Shantou University Medicine College
National Center for Children's Health/Education Department, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University
Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University