Objective: To explore the application method and value of mind mapping in general practitioners clinical teaching. Methods: 60 GPs were divided into test group and control group
and compared clinical knowledge achievement in the two groups
at the same time
a questionnaire was conducted. Results: The difference between two groups in theoretical teaching was statistically significant (P < 0.05)
and there was no significant difference in physical examination (P >0.05). In addition
the results of the questionnaire survey showed that test group was better than before in medical knowledge
self-learning ability
interpersonal communication ability
team cooperation ability and other dimensions
and was better than the control group. Conclusion: Mind mapping was an effective teaching tool for general practitioners.