Value of transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters in evaluating ER and predicting conception outcomes in planning pregnancy women
返回论文页
|更新时间:2024-04-19
|
Value of transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters in evaluating ER and predicting conception outcomes in planning pregnancy women
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 26, Issue 3, (2024)
作者机构:
兰州大学第一医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2024,
Published Online:3 April 2024,
扫 描 看 全 文
Value of transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters in evaluating ER and predicting conception outcomes in planning pregnancy women. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 26(3).(2024)
DOI:
Value of transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters in evaluating ER and predicting conception outcomes in planning pregnancy women. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 26(3).(2024)DOI:
Value of transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters in evaluating ER and predicting conception outcomes in planning pregnancy women
Objective To explore the value of transvaginal three-dimensional power Doppler imaging (3D-PDI) combined with two-dimensional real-time shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in evaluating endometrial receptivity (ER) and predicting conception outcomes in planning pregnancy women. Methods A total of 87 planning pregnancy women undergoing follicular test in the hospital were enrolled between January 2020 and march 2022. All underwent 3D-PDI and 2D-SWE
and were tested for reproductive hormone on the 7th-8th day after ovulation (implantation window period). All were followed up for 3 month. According to conception outcomes
they were divided into conception group (31 cases) and non-conception group (56 cases). The levels of serum estradiol (E2)
testosterone (T)
progesterone (P)
luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) during implantation window period
vascularization flow index (VFI) and elasticity modulus during proliferation period were compared between the two groups. The predictive value of transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters for conception outcomes was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results There was no significant difference in age
BMI
reproductive history
planning pregnancy time
E2
P
T
LH or FSH between the two groups (P>0.05). The endometrial thickness in conception group was significantly thicker than that in non-conception group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in uterine volume
types of endometrial echoes or classifications of endometrial blood flow between the two groups (P>0.05). S/D and elasticity modulus during proliferation period in conception group were significantly lower than those in non-conception group
while FI was significantly higher than that in non-conception group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in PI
RI
VI or VFI between the two groups (P>0.05). ROC curves analysis showed that area under ROC curve (AUC) values of endometrial thickness
S/D
FI
elasticity modulus during proliferation period and combined detection for predicting conception outcomes were 0.789
0.851
0.853
0.840 and 0.895
respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion Transvaginal 3D-PDI combined with 2D-SWE quantitative parameters can evaluate ER in planning pregnancy women objectively and comprehensively
which can be applied to predict conception outcomes in clinical practice.