A comparative assessment of outcomes following minimally invasive total hip replacement—posterior approach versus lateral approach

ZHANG Jian; et al

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A comparative assessment of outcomes following minimally invasive total hip replacement—posterior approach versus lateral approach

更新时间：2024-01-17

- A comparative assessment of outcomes following minimally invasive total hip replacement—posterior approach versus lateral approach
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Issue 9, Pages: 991-993(2007)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院骨科
  2. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院骨科,重庆,400016
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： R687.4
- Published：2007，
扫描看全文
[1]张健,周爱国.经后方及外侧小切口微创全髋关节置换入路的比较研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2007(09):991-993.

ZHANG Jian, et al. A comparative assessment of outcomes following minimally invasive total hip replacement—posterior approach versus lateral approach. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University (9):991-993(2007)
[1]张健,周爱国.经后方及外侧小切口微创全髋关节置换入路的比较研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2007(09):991-993. DOI：

ZHANG Jian, et al. A comparative assessment of outcomes following minimally invasive total hip replacement—posterior approach versus lateral approach. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University (9):991-993(2007) DOI：

摘要

目的:比较经后方及外侧微创全髋关节置换人路的临床疗效。方法:由同一组手术医生行外侧入路微创全髋关节置换23例

后方入路微创全髋关节置换36例。比较两种不同入路的切口长度、手术时间、出血量、术后并发症、术后12周Harris评分及假体的位置、血沉及C-反应蛋白。结果:所有病例均获得随访

出血量、术后并发症、术后12周Harris评分及假体的位置、术后疼痛评分经统计学处理无显著性差异（P≥0.05）。在外侧入路血沉及C-反应蛋白较高（P≤0.05）。结论:后方及外侧微创全

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical effect of lateral and posterior approaches during the total hip replacement(THA) with Minimal-Incision Surgery(MIS).Methods:Twenty-three cases were performed with lateral approach

All were performed by the same surgeon.23 cases who had undergone a MIS THA with lateral approach were compared with 36 cases who had undergone MIS THA with the posterior approaches.The average follow-up period was 12 weeks.The patients were compared with respect to the length of the incision

surgical time

intra-operative blood loss

Harris hip score

component malpositioning

complications.Results:There were no differences between the two approaches with regard to the length of the skin incision

operating time

Harris hip score

component malpositioning and major complications.Statistically significant differences were found in two groups in terms of blood sedimentation and C-reaction protein.Conclusion:Both approaches can be effectively performed without increased risk of complications.Significant benefits of posterior approaches include less soft tissue damage.

关键词

全髋关节置换术微创技术关节成形术髋关节关节假体疗效

Keywords

The total hip replacementA minimal-invasive surgeryArthroplastyHipHip prosthesisTreatment outcome

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

A comparative assessment of outcomes of large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty versus conventional total hip arthroplasty following posterolateral minimal incision

A clinical analysis of multidisciplinary treatment effectiveness in patients with breast cancer

Animal experimental study on the intra-articular pressure change children with synoyitis of hip

Detecting IL-2 and IL-10 to predicate treatment outcome for Graves disease

Appraisement of initialclinical efficacy of treatment of cervical spondylotic with artificial cervical disc prosthsis replacement in 12 cases

Related Author

杨伊萍

周爱国

et al

SHI Lin-jun

唐欣

et al

GUO Huilin

LU Xiaohu

Related Institution

Department of Orthopedics,the First Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University

重庆医科大学检验系

Department of Oncology,the First Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University

重庆医科大学附属第一医院肿瘤科重庆400010 重庆医科大学附属第二医院肿瘤科

Department of Orthopedics,Shenzhen People’s Hospital

⁰