Construction of the continue nursing effectiveness evaluation index for patients with coronary heart disease after PCI

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Construction of the continue nursing effectiveness evaluation index for patients with coronary heart disease after PCI

更新时间：2023-12-22

- Construction of the continue nursing effectiveness evaluation index for patients with coronary heart disease after PCI
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Vol. 43, Issue 2, Pages: 285(2018)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2018，
扫描看全文
Construction of the continue nursing effectiveness evaluation index for patients with coronary heart disease after PCI. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 43(2):285(2018)
DOI：

Construction of the continue nursing effectiveness evaluation index for patients with coronary heart disease after PCI. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 43(2):285(2018) DOI：

摘要

目的：构建系统、科学的冠心病PCI术后患者延续护理成效评价指标，并检验其信效度。方法：以文献分析和质性研究为基础，通过Delphi法确立冠心病PCI术后患者延续护理成效评价指标。选取其中9名专家对指标和条目进行相关性评分，计算内容效度。对231名冠心病PCI术后患者进行测评，检验其信效度。结果：最终构建的冠心病PCI术后患者延续护理成效评价指标包含4项一级指标、15项二级指标、35项三级指标。该指标Cronbach’s α系数为0.926，各维度Cronbach’s α系数依次为0.600、0.768、0.918、0.798，折半信度为0.952。内容效度为0.890，主成分提取6个公因子，累积贡献率达69.26%。结论：该评价指标具有较好的科学性、可靠性、实用性和可行性，能够科学有效地评价冠心病PCI术后患者延续护理的成效。

Abstract

Objective：To establish a systematic and scientific evaluation index of continuing nursing for CHD after percutaneous coro－nary intervention（PCI），and to test the reliability and validity. Methods：Based on literature analysis and qualitative research，the effectiveness evaluation index of patients with CHD after PCI and was developed to determine the content index by Delphi method. Nine experts were invited to perform CVI. The reliability and validity of the index were tested among 231 patients with CHD after PCI in hospital another. Results：The final evaluation index consisted of 4 first indicators，15 second indicators and 35 third indicators. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.926 for the total index. The Cronbach’s alpha of 4 first indicators were 0.600，0.768，0.918，0.798. The split half reliability was 0.952. The index content validity index was 0.890. Factor analysis was used to extract 6 factors and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.26%. Conclusion：The evaluation index is scientific，reliable，practical and feasible. It can evaluated the quality of continuous nursing scientifically and effectively.

关键词

冠心病PCI术后延续护理成效评价指标信度效度

Keywords

coronary heart disease postoperativepercutaneous coronary interventiontransitional careevaluating indicatorreliabili－tyvalidity

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of social impact scale applied in study of stigma in colostomy patients

Reliability and validity of questionnaire of health education needs for patients with gynecological chemotherapy

Reliability and validity for Chinese version of pediatric quality of life inventoryTM （PedsQLTM） 3.0 neuromuscular module

Application of the Chinese version of brief illness perception questionnaire in patients with somatoform disorder

Related Author

Haiping Zhang

Qian Yu

Yiyin Xing

Jun Xiao

Jing Fu

Liu Yue

Wang Xihan

Mou Shaoyu

Related Institution

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences&Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Neurology Department, Psychiatric Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences&Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Graduate student in Neurology, Southwest Medical University

Neuropsychology Department, Psychiatric Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences&Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

College of Nursing,Chongqing Medical University

⁰