Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi(716 cases)
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-12-22
|
Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi(716 cases)
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 43, Issue 4, Pages: 604(2018)
作者机构:
陆军军医大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,重庆,400038
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2018,
扫 描 看 全 文
Li Qianwei, Wang Cong, Pu Chunxiao, et al. Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi(716 cases). [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 43(4):604(2018)
DOI:
Li Qianwei, Wang Cong, Pu Chunxiao, et al. Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi(716 cases). [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 43(4):604(2018)DOI:
Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculi(716 cases)
目的:探讨输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石治疗肾结石的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2017年7月至2017年12月我科收治的716例肾结石患者,行输尿管软镜钬激光碎石手术,其中一期手术组377例,术前留置双J管二期手术组339例,统计软镜工作鞘置入成功率、手术时间、住院时间、结石清除率、并发症发生率等;并发症包括输尿管损伤、狭窄、发热及尿源性脓毒症、大出血等。结果:2组术前结石大小、结石位置、结石清除率(94.1% vs. 93.7%)等无统计学差异(P >0.05),但一期手术组与二期手术组在工作鞘置入成功率(90.2% vs. 100%)上有明显统计学差异(P<0.05)。2组均未出现输尿管撕脱、尿源性脓毒症等严重并发症。结论:术前免留置双J 管行一期输尿管软镜钬激光碎石安全有效,与二期输尿管软镜手术相比,无明显差异,一期手术成功率关键取决于软镜工作鞘置入成功与否,与患者本身输尿管是否狭窄、扭曲等,以及术者经验有关。
Abstract
Objective:To analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser(FURS) without a pre-existing ureteral stent for renal calculi. Methods:Clinical data of 716 patients who underwent FURS from July 2017 to December 2017 at this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. There were 377 patients without pre-existing ureteral stent and 339 patients with pre-existing ureteral stent. The overall the success rate of ureteral access sheath placement,operation time,overall hospital stay,stone free rate (SFR) and overall complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results:There was no significant difference between two groups in the preoperative stone size,stone location and SFR(94.1% vs. 93.7%)(P>0.05). But there were significant differences be-tween two groups in the success rate of ureteral access sheath placement(90.2% vs.100.0%)(P<0.05). No serious complication occurred in two groups. Conclusion:It is safe and effective for the FURS without pre-existing ureteral stent. Compared with the pre-existing group,there was no significant difference in the results. The success rate of FURS without pre-existing ureteral stent depends on the success of the sheath implantation and is related to the stricture or distortion of ureter,as well as the surgeon’s experience.