A dosimetric study of helical tomotherapy in radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-12-22
|
A dosimetric study of helical tomotherapy in radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 44, Issue 1, Pages: 39(2019)
作者机构:
重庆大学附属肿瘤医院、重庆市肿瘤研究所、重庆市肿瘤医院妇瘤科,重庆,400030
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2019,
扫 描 看 全 文
Guo Mingfang, Liu Xianfeng, Liu Li, et al. A dosimetric study of helical tomotherapy in radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 44(1):39(2019)
DOI:
Guo Mingfang, Liu Xianfeng, Liu Li, et al. A dosimetric study of helical tomotherapy in radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 44(1):39(2019)DOI:
A dosimetric study of helical tomotherapy in radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer
Objective:To investigate the dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy(TOMO) versus intensity-modulated radiother-apy(IMRT) in radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods:A total of 21 young patients with early-stage cervical cancer were enrolled,and each of them received radiotherapy with both TOMO and IMRT. The two methods were compared in terms of conformity index(CI) and homogeneity index(HI) of target volume,dose dis-tribution in target volume and organs at risk(OARs),number of monitor units(MUs),and delivery time(DT). Results:TOMO had sig-nificantly better CI and HI of the target volume than IMRT(CI:0.894±0.006 vs. 0.855±0.008,P=0.000;HI:1.082±0.006 vs. 1.106±0.006,P=0.023). As for ovarian protection,TOMO had significantly lower V5 and Dmean than IMRT(V5:17.20±0.18 vs. 38.92±0.70,P=0.000;Dmean:4.21±0.03 vs. 4.82±0.04). TOMO also had dosimetric advantages for the normal tissues,but TOMO needed a significantly higher number of MUs than IMRT(7 729±42 vs. 1 974±23,P=0.000). These two methods had a similar DT. Conclusion:Compared with IMRT,TOMO can obtain better conformity and homogeneity of target volume and better protect the ovary and the pelvic cavity,and therefore,it is the best choice for radiotherapy after ovarian-conserving radical surgery for young patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Cervical cancer screening system TruScreen with graph neural network-based classification versus HPV DNA quantification in high-risk HPV-positive patients
Research progress on artificial intelligence in screening and precise diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer
CXCL10/CCL2 signaling pathway mediates the development of cervical cancer in tumor microenvironment
Expression changes and its significance of SMYD2 in cervical cancer
Comparison of lung dosimetry between supine and sternal horizon positions during X-ray irradiated radical mastectomy radiation therapy
Related Author
Hu Yanli
Zhou Leming
Huang Zhongxiu
Huang Shixin
Li Xiaosong
Zhu Xuehui
Rong Chao
Li Ang
Related Institution
Department of Gynecology,Qianjiang Hospital,Chongqing University
School of Computer Science and Technology,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qianjiang Hospital,Chongqing University
Science and Education Department,Yubei District People’s Hospital of Chongqing
Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology,School of Biology & Basic Medical Sciences, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University