Comparative study of effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia on haemodynamics in the puerpera with cesarean delivery
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-12-18
|
Comparative study of effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia on haemodynamics in the puerpera with cesarean delivery
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 38, Issue 9, Pages: 1337-1342(2014)
作者机构:
1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院1. 麻醉科
2. 呼吸与危重病医学,乌鲁木齐,830054
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2014,
扫 描 看 全 文
Chen Hong, Wang Zaiyi. Comparative study of effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia on haemodynamics in the puerpera with cesarean delivery. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 38(9):1337-1342(2014)
DOI:
Chen Hong, Wang Zaiyi. Comparative study of effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia on haemodynamics in the puerpera with cesarean delivery. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 38(9):1337-1342(2014)DOI:
Comparative study of effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia on haemodynamics in the puerpera with cesarean delivery
Objective:To research and improve the anesthesia management of cesarean delivery and to provide references for clinical to ensure the maternal and child safety. Methods:Eighty puerpera with cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive com-bined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA group) or epidural anesthesia(EA group) with 40 cases in each group. Homodynamic changes,anesthetic effect,neonatal Apgar score,complications and adverse reactions were measured in the two groups. Results:Heart rate(HR) of puerpera was higher in CSEA group than in EA group at T4(10 min after child birth)and T5(operation finish)(P=0.023,0.022). Systolic blood pressure(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure(DBP) were higher in CSEA group than in EA group at T3 (child birth)(P=0.000,0.000). Mean arterial pressure(MAP) was higher in CSEA group than in EA group at T2(satisfied anesthesia-before disinfection)and T5(operation finish)(P=0.000,0.003). There was no differences in cardiac output(CO),stroke volume(SV),systemic vascular resistance(SVR) and thoracic fluid content(TFC) between two groups at different time points(all P >0.05).There were differences in HR,SBP,DBP,MAP,CO,SV and SVR within each group at different time points(P<0.05). Anesthetic effect of CSEA group was better than that of EA group(P=0.000). There were differences in neonatal Apgar score,complications and adverse reactions between two groups(P >0.05). Conclusion:EA and CSEA are both suitable anesthesia for the puerpera with cesarean de-livery. However,CSEA is more recommended for its faster onset,better anesthetic effect and little effect on maternal hemodynamics.
ACOG guidelines for the management of fetal macrosomia:essential introduction
A STUDY OF THE DOSAGE AND VOLUME OF LOCAL ANESTHETICS FOR ESWL UNDER EXTRADURAL ANESTHESIA
Clinical observation on sedative effects of epidural anesthesia assisted with target controlled infusion of propofol
The study of thoracic epidural anesthesia on cardiac function and the size of infarcted area in rabbits with acute myocardial infarction
Application of continuous epidural block combined with basal anesthesia in pediatric inguinal region operation
Related Author
Zheng Jing
Qi Hongbo
付士模
吴琪
郑光天
李昌群
王桂珍
魏安宁
Related Institution
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,China-Canada-New Zealand Joint Laboratory of Maternal and Fetal Medicine,Chongqing Medical University
重庆医科大学第二医院麻醉科
重庆医科大学第二医院碎石中心
Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University