Effects of angiotensin enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing PCI or CAG
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-12-18
|
Effects of angiotensin enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing PCI or CAG
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 40, Issue 4, Pages: 522-526(2015)
作者机构:
1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科,重庆,400016
2. 成都市第三人民医院心血管内科,成都,610031
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2015,
扫 描 看 全 文
He Xiaojiao, Yang Yuan, Cai Lin, et al. Effects of angiotensin enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing PCI or CAG. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 40(4):522-526(2015)
DOI:
He Xiaojiao, Yang Yuan, Cai Lin, et al. Effects of angiotensin enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing PCI or CAG. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 40(4):522-526(2015)DOI:
Effects of angiotensin enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing PCI or CAG
Objective:To evaluate the effect of angiotensin enzyme inhibitors(ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers(ARB) therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy(CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiogram(CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods:Search was conducted in PubMed,The Cochrane library,VIP,CNKI and Wanfang data for literatures about ACEI or ARB and CIN up to August 2014. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,articles were screened and data were extracted and quality of included studies was evaluated. Mata analysis was conducted by using Stata 11.0 software. Moreover,Begg’s and Egger’s regression were used to assess the publication bias of included articles. Results:Eleven studies were included. Among the patients un-dergoing PCI or CAG,the usage of ACEI/ARB before those operations did not increase the risk of CIN compared with that of control group,and there is no significant difference(RR=0.78;95%CI=0.53 to 1.15,P=0.22). In subgroup analysis,subgroups underwent ACEI/ARB treatment for at least 2 weeks(RR=0.78,95%CI=0.37 to 1.62,P=0.50) and less than 2 weeks(RR=0.79,95%CI=0.50 to 1.24,P=0.30) had no influence on the incidence of CIN. The risk of CIN at 72 h after coronary intervention therapy was decreased(RR=0.23,95%CI=0.23 to 0.87,P=0.02) and the subgroup with contrast agent≤150ml showed a decreasing incidence of CIN(RR=0.57,95%CI=0.33 to 0.99,P=0.046). Conclusion:There is no evi-dence to suggest that use of ACEI/ARB will increase the risk of CIN in patients undergoing PCI/CAG at present.