Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion measured by LDDSE combined with MCE in patients undergoing PCI
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion measured by LDDSE combined with MCE in patients undergoing PCI
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 9, (2023)
作者机构:
1. 汕头市中心医院超声诊断科
2. 汕头市中心医院心内科
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:7 October 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion measured by LDDSE combined with MCE in patients undergoing PCI. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(9).(2023)
DOI:
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion measured by LDDSE combined with MCE in patients undergoing PCI. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(9).(2023)DOI:
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion measured by LDDSE combined with MCE in patients undergoing PCI
Objective To investigate the prognostic value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) combined with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 32 patients with coronary heart disease who underwent PCI in the hospital from March 2020 to February 2021 were selected as the research subjects. All patients underwent LDDSE and MCE before PCI and at 3 months and 12 months after PCI. Perfusion of normal and necrotic myocardium was compared before and after operation. The patients were grouped according to the prognosis. Myocardial perfusion indicators were compared between patients with poor prognosis and patients with good prognosis at 3 months after PCI. The prognostic value of these indicators was analyzed. Results The A
β and A×β values measured by MCE alone and by LDDSE combined with MCE at the necrotic myocardium were lower than those of normal myocardium (P<0.05). The A
β and A×β values measured by MCE alone and by LDDSE combined with MCE at the necrotic myocardium at 3 months and 12 months after PCI were higher than those before PCI
and lower than those of normal myocardium (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in A
β and A×β values measured by MCE alone and by LDDSE combined with MCE at 3 months and 12 months after PCI (P>0.05). After PCI
the A
β and A×β values measured by MCE alone and by LDDSE combined with MCE at the necrotic myocardium were lower in patients with poor prognosis than those with good prognosis (P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values of A
β and A×β values measured by MCE alone for prognosis were 0.682
0.710 and 0.712. The AUC values of A
β and A×β values measured by LDDSE combined with MCE were 0.892
0.853 and 0.801. Conclusion LDDSE combined with MCE can reflect myocardial microcirculation perfusion after PCI
Changes of craniocerebral ultrasound parameters and their relationship with disease severity and prognosis in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
Clinical value of optic nerve sheath diameter by ultrasonic detection in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute increased intracranial pressure
Prognostic value of four-dimensional ultrasound automatic quantitative analysis combined with HRV detected by electrocardiography in patients with AMI
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound predicts acute kidney injury and its prognosis in patients with sepsis
Evaluation of the relationship between left ventricular myocardial strain and prognosis in patients with light chain cardiac amyloidosis by 3D-STI