Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and MRI in the examination of fetal closed spina bifida in primary hospitals
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and MRI in the examination of fetal closed spina bifida in primary hospitals
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 6, (2023)
作者机构:
河北省保定市第一中心医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:30 June 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
zhenjinghua. Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and MRI in the examination of fetal closed spina bifida in primary hospitals. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(6).(2023)
DOI:
zhenjinghua. Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and MRI in the examination of fetal closed spina bifida in primary hospitals. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(6).(2023)DOI:
Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and MRI in the examination of fetal closed spina bifida in primary hospitals
Objective: To investigate the value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prenatal diagnosis of fetal spina bifida closed.Methods: A total of 26 fetuses with clinically confirmed closed spina bifida were selected as the study group
and 38 fetuses without nervous system abnormalities were selected as the control group. The diagnostic results of prenatal ultrasound
MRI and combined examination were retrospectively analyzed in the study group and the control group. The sensitivity and specificity of different examination methods were compared
and the efficiency was checked by comparing the area under the ROC curve. Results: 26 cases of spina bifida were diagnosed clinically after delivery
24 cases were diagnosed accurately before delivery
20 cases were diagnosed by ultrasound
17 cases were diagnosed by MRI
24 cases were diagnosed by combined diagnosis
2 cases were missed diagnosis(1 case of tethered cord and 1case of furicular sinus). There were significant differences in sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
negative predictive value and accuracy of the three methods in the diagnosis of closed spina bifida (P<0.05). The areas under ROC curves of the three methods were 0.8964
0.8757 and 0.9120
respectively
and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasound can be used as the first examination for the diagnosis of fetal spina bifida in primary hospitals
MRI as a supplementary examination
the combination of the two examination can be more effective in the detection of fetal spina bifida.