The Utility of the Ultrasound " Superimposed-Line" Sign in First Trimester Screening for Fetal Cleft Palate
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
The Utility of the Ultrasound " Superimposed-Line" Sign in First Trimester Screening for Fetal Cleft Palate
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 2, (2023)
作者机构:
成都市第一人民医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:6 March 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
The Utility of the Ultrasound " Superimposed-Line" Sign in First Trimester Screening for Fetal Cleft Palate. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(2).(2023)
DOI:
The Utility of the Ultrasound " Superimposed-Line" Sign in First Trimester Screening for Fetal Cleft Palate. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(2).(2023)DOI:
The Utility of the Ultrasound " Superimposed-Line" Sign in First Trimester Screening for Fetal Cleft Palate
Objective: The current study evaluates the diagnostic value of screening for a fetal cleft palate by using the ultrasound-based observation of the "superimposed-line" sign appearing at the junction of the vomer and maxilla in the first trimester of pregnancy. Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed of ultrasonographic images of nuchal translucency (NT) obtained during the first trimester of pregnancy (11–13+6 weeks) from 45 fetuses with a cleft palate later confirmed following parturition or induced labor (cases) and 4500 normal fetuses confirmed after parturition (controls). Ultrasonographic features of the "superimposed-line" sign were observed and recorded
and between-group comparisons were performed. Results: The "superimposed-line" sign was absent in 39 cases (86.67%)
including 4 (8.89%) with simple secondary hard palate cleft and 35 (77.78%) with secondary hard palate cleft complicated by a primary cleft palate. 6 cases showed the "superimposed-line" sign (13.33%)
including 2 (4.44%) with a simple secondary soft palate cleft
1 (2.22%) with a simple secondary bifid uvula
and 3 (6.67%) with a simple primary cleft palate. Among the 4500 controls
4469 fetuses showed the "superimposed-line" sign (99.31%) and 31 fetuses showed an absence of the "superimposed-line" sign (0.69%). The between-group difference was significant (p<0.05). The sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
and negative predictive values of the "superimposed-line" sign in the first trimester of pregnancy for predicting fetal cleft palate were 86.67%(39/45)
99.31%(4469/4500)
55.71%(39/70)
and 99.86%(4469/4475)
respectively. Conclusion: The "superimposed-line" sign did not appear in fetuses with secondary hard palate cleft and primary cleft palate only when a secondary hard palate cleft is present. The sign appeared in normal fetuses and those with a simple primary cleft palate
simple secondary soft palate cleft
or with a simple secondary bifid uvula. Based on these results
we propose that the "superimposed-line" sign in the mid-sagittal plane of the fetal face in the first trimester of pregnancy is an important tool in screening for fetal cleft palate