Safety analysis of intravenous sulfur hexafluoride microbubble in abdominal ultrasonography
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
Safety analysis of intravenous sulfur hexafluoride microbubble in abdominal ultrasonography
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 5, (2023)
作者机构:
陆军军医大学第一附属医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:26 May 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
tanyingyue. Safety analysis of intravenous sulfur hexafluoride microbubble in abdominal ultrasonography. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(5).(2023)
DOI:
tanyingyue. Safety analysis of intravenous sulfur hexafluoride microbubble in abdominal ultrasonography. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(5).(2023)DOI:
Safety analysis of intravenous sulfur hexafluoride microbubble in abdominal ultrasonography
Objective To analyze the safety of abdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) after intravenous injection of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles. Methods All patients who underwent abdominal CEUS examination with intravenous injection of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in our center from January 2006 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The basic information
symptoms and signs of patients with adverse events(AEs) were collected
and the types
severity and risk factors of AEs were summarized. Results A total of 91312 intravenous injections of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles were enrolled and 35 cases (0.038%) had AEs
including 25 males and 10 females. A total of 18 cases were mild
10 moderate and 7 severe in severity
and no death occurred. There were 7 allergy-like AEs and 28 physiologic AEs. For patients with allergy-like AEs
the most common sign and symptom was limited urticaria/pruritis. For patients with physiologic AEs
the most common signs and symptoms were nausea/vomiting and vasovagal reactions. The most common age of the AEs were 40~60 years old (65.7%
23/35).Thirty-one (88.6%) patients had abnormal liver function. Only one has a history of sulfa drug allergy. Almost all patients with AEs (97.1%
34/35) occurred within 10 minutes after contrast agent injection
and all patients were recovered on the same day. Among the patients with mild AEs
12 were relieved without any treatment and 6 were relieved after receiving corresponding treatment. All the patients with moderate and severe AEs were relieved after receiving corresponding treatment. Conclusion The incidence of adverse events after intravenous injection of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in abdominal CEUS is very low
The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of local thermal ablation of liver cancer and the analysis of the influencing factors of local tumor progression
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system in high-risk patients with alpha-fetoprotein- negative hepatocellular carcinoma
Related Author
张慧
薛改琴
郑丽丽
任新平
詹维伟
冯梅晶
李军建
夏纪筑
Related Institution
山西省肿瘤医院 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院山西医院 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院超声科
江苏省无锡市新吴区新瑞医院 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院无锡分院超声科
Institute of Ultrasound Imaging ﹠ Department of Ultrasound,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging
Department of Ultrasound,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College ,Huazhong University of Science and Technology