Comparison of ultrasonic imaging characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
Comparison of ultrasonic imaging characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 2, (2023)
作者机构:
四川省自贡市第四人民医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:6 March 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
Li Ying. Comparison of ultrasonic imaging characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(2).(2023)
DOI:
Li Ying. Comparison of ultrasonic imaging characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(2).(2023)DOI:
Comparison of ultrasonic imaging characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes
Objective To explore and compare ultrasonic imaging characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the 130 patients with breast cancer admitted to the hospital between March 2019 and March 2021. According to the results of immunohistochemistry
they were divided into luminal A group (Luminal A
n=38)
luminal B group (Luminal B
n=41)
triple-negative group (n=29) and proto-oncogene human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) overexpression group (n=22). The clinical data
imaging characteristics and pathological characteristics in the four groups were recorded and compared. The relationship between pathological characteristics and imaging characteristics was analyzed. Results There were significant differences in histological grading
lymph node metastasis
tumor diameter
tumor boundary
echo types
posterior echo
tumor morphology
tumor calcification and blood flow grading among the four groups (P<0.05). The main ultrasonic imaging characteristics in Luminal type included spicule sign
low echo
no calcification
irregular morphology and grade 0-I blood flow. The main ultrasonic imaging characteristics in triple-negative type included micro-lobulation sign
low echo
posterior echo enhancement
irregular morphology
no calcification and grade II-III blood flow. The main ultrasonic imaging characteristics in HER-2 overexpression type included blurred sign
low echo
posterior echo enhancement
irregular morphology
calcification and grade II-III blood flow. There were significant differences in blood flow and tumor morphology among patients with breast cancer at grades I
II and III (P<0.05). Conclusion There are certain ultrasonic imaging characteristics and pathological characteristics in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes. Clinically
molecular subtypes can be determined according to imaging characteristics and pathological characteristics. Individualized treatment regimens can be selected based on these to improve prognosis and prolong patients survival.