Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-09
|
Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 22, Issue 12, (2020)
作者机构:
绵阳市中医医院超声医学科
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2020,
Published Online:31 December 2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(12).(2020)
DOI:
Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(12).(2020)DOI:
Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor
Objective: To explore the role of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of the medical records of 82 patients with rectal cancer who were treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020. According to the results of postoperative histopathological examination
they were divided into two groups: the rectal cancer group (53 cases) and the rectal stromal tumor group (29 cases). The maximum diameter
peak blood flow velocity
resistance index
ultrasonographic characteristics
IMAX
RT
TTP and MTT of the two groups were compared
and the coincidence rate of differential diagnosis between rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor was also compared. Results: The mean maximum diameter
peak flow velocity and resistance index of rectal cancer group were significantly higher than those of rectal stromal tumor group (P < 0.05). In CDUS features
the internal echo of rectal cancer was more uniform than that of rectal stromal tumor
and most of the lesions surrounded the intestinal cavity
the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The IMAX value of CEUS in rectal cancer group was higher than that in rectal stromal tumor group
and the RT value
TTP value and MTT value of CEUS were significantly lower than those in rectal stromal tumor group (P < 0.05). The accuracy rate of CEUS was 98.11% (52 / 53)
93.101% (27 / 29)
96.34% (79 / 82)
86.79% (46 / 53)
89.66% (26 / 29) and 87.80% (72 / 82)
respectively The total coincidence rate of different diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor was significantly higher than that of CDUS (P < 0.05). Conclusion:Transrectal CEUS and CDUS play a higher role in the differential diagnosis of rectal cancer and rectal stromal tumor
The Value of Multi-parametric Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of Tumor Regression Grade of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Treatment
Study on the differential diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma subtype and angiomyolipoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
The differential diagnosis of ultrasound for undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma and hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma in children
The ultrasound diagnosis and differential diagnosisthe of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary
A nomogram model for predicting fetal growth restriction with quantitative parameters by color Doppler ultrasound
Related Author
庄华
闫静文
杨音
敬基刚
罗源
廖中凡
樊瑞琪
贾春梅
Related Institution
sichaununiversity
Department of Ultrasound,First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院
山西省儿童医院
Department of Obstetrics,Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University