Application value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of varicocele
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
Application value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of varicocele
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 7, (2023)
作者机构:
上海市第一人民医院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:31 July 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
Application value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of varicocele. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(7).(2023)
DOI:
Application value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of varicocele. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(7).(2023)DOI:
Application value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of varicocele
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the value of quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced utrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of varicocele (VC). Methods: 27 patients with left-sided VC in the hospital were selected as the study group
and 27 healthy male volunteers were selected as the control group during the same period. All participants had CEUS performed on both spermatic veins
and quantitative parameters were obtained: transiting time from spermatic artery to spermatic vein (TT)
arrival time in vein (ATV)
time-taking to peak in vein (TTPV)
peak time in vein (PTV)
wash-out time 50% in vein (WOT50%)
and half time in vein (HTV). Differences between the two groups were compared. Results: The differences in TT
ATV
TTPV
PTV
WOT50% and HTV between the left and right spermatic veins in the study group were statistically significant (all P<0.05); the differences in the quantitative parameters between the left and right spermatic veins in the control group were not statistically significant. The differences in TT
ATV
TTPV
PTV
WOT50% and HTV of the left spermatic vein between the study group and the control group were statistically significant (all P<0.05); the differences in the quantitative parameters of right spermatic vein between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The quantitative parameters of CEUS can reflect the hemodynamic situation of the spermatic vein and have some application in the diagnosis of VC.