Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation of anorectal angle in patients with different degrees of uterine prolapse
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-11
|
Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation of anorectal angle in patients with different degrees of uterine prolapse
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 25, Issue 7, (2023)
作者机构:
,n
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2023,
Published Online:31 July 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation of anorectal angle in patients with different degrees of uterine prolapse. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(7).(2023)
DOI:
Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation of anorectal angle in patients with different degrees of uterine prolapse. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 25(7).(2023)DOI:
Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation of anorectal angle in patients with different degrees of uterine prolapse
Objective To evaluate the anorectal angle (ARA) and its changes at rest
during contraction and Valsalva maneuver by pelvic floor ultrasound. And to explore its relationship with the degree of uterine prolapse.Methods A total of 131 women who underwent pelvic floor ultrasound examination in our hospital were divided into no prolapse group (47 cases)
stage I prolapse group (40 cases)
and stage II or above prolapse group (44 cases) based on the degree of uterine prolapse. Pelvic floor ultrasound was used to measure ARA at rest
during contraction and Valsalva maneuver in each group. ARA and its changes in different states were compared
and its relationship with the degree of uterine prolapse was analyzed.Results There was a statistically significant difference in vARA and ARA changes during Valsalva maneuver among the three groups (all P<0.001). Compared with the no prolapse group
the vARA of the stage I prolapse group decreased
while the vARA of the stage II or above prolapse group increased
with statistical significance (both P<0.05). Compared with the stage I prolapse group
the vARA of the stage II or above prolapse group increased
with statistical significance (P<0.05). During Valsalva maneuver,ARA decreased in the stage Ⅰ group,and increased in the no prolapse group and the stage Ⅱ group(both P<0.001).ARA increased more in the stage II group(P=0.004).Conclusion The application of pelvic floor ultrasound can evaluate the ARA and its changes in patients with varying degrees of uterine prolapse. ARA and its changes in Valsalva maneuver are related to the degree of uterine prolapse and have certain clinical value.