Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-10-09
|
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in MedicineVol. 22, Issue 11, (2020)
作者机构:
朝阳市中心医院超声科,122000
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2020,
Published Online:1 December 2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(11).(2020)
DOI:
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(11).(2020)DOI:
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors
Objective To explore the value of contrast-enhancement ultrasound(CEUS) examination in improving the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast BI-RADS types 3 and 4 tumors. methods A total of 76 breast masses confirmed by biopsy or surgical pathology were collected from 71 patients who were admitted to the Chaoyang Central Hospital in Liaoning Province from March 2019 to April 2020. All the tumors included in the study were examined by conventional ultrasound and CEUS
and were paralleled with BI-RADS classification and CEUS score. According to the CEUS score results
readjust the classification of breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors
and compare the diagnostic efficacy of the BI-RADS classification before and after adjustment to the benign and malignant breast BI-RADS type 3 and 4 tumors. Results ①Of the 76 breast lumps
43 were benign and 33 were malignant; after adjustment
the BI-RADS classification was 7 in 2 categories
12 in 3 categories (4 in 3 categories remained unchanged)
and 20 in 4a categories (up 2 in category 3 )
15 types 4b
11 types 4c
and 11 types 5; the biopsy rate of BI-RADS type 4 tumors decreased to 69.8%
the misdiagnosis rate is only 1.6%. ②The sensitivity
specificity
and accuracy of BI-RADS classification diagnosis before and after adjustment were 75.8%
76.7%
76.3%
97.0%
88.4%
and 92.1%
respectively. ③The areas under the ROC curve of the BI-RADS classification before and after adjustment were 0.763 and 0.927
respectively
the difference was statistically significant (Z=3.965
P<0.05). Conclusion CEUS examination combined with BI-RADS classification can improve the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast BI-RADS 3 and 4 tumors
and reduce unnecessary biopsy of BI-RADS 4 tumors.
Correlation between contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and Ki-67 expression in cervical metastatic lymph nodes of NSCLC
Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and quantitative ultrasound indicators to explore the consistency of renal blood perfusion in chronic renal disease
Application of Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent Sonazoid in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Liver Cancer
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic diagnosis of Intramural gallbladder hematoma:a case report