Effect of subanesthetic dose of ketamine on gut microbiota in depressed mice
返回论文页
|更新时间:2023-04-16
|
Effect of subanesthetic dose of ketamine on gut microbiota in depressed mice
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 47, Issue 9, Pages: 1018-1024(2022)
作者机构:
西南医科大学附属医院 麻醉科,泸州,646000
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R614.1
Published:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
Liu Xing. Effect of subanesthetic dose of ketamine on gut microbiota in depressed mice. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 47(9):1018-1024(2022)
DOI:
Liu Xing. Effect of subanesthetic dose of ketamine on gut microbiota in depressed mice. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 47(9):1018-1024(2022)DOI:
Effect of subanesthetic dose of ketamine on gut microbiota in depressed mice
Objective: To investigate the effect of subanesthetic dose of ketamine on gut microbiota among male and female depressed mice. Methods: The study included in 20 healthy male SPF mice and 20 female C57BL/6 mice
and they were randomly assigned to eight groups (n=5): female control group (FC group)
female control with ketamine treatment group (FCK group)
female depression group (FD group)
female depression with ketamine treatment group (FDK group)
male control group (MC group)
male control with ketamine treatment group (MCK group)
male depression group (MD group) and male depression with ketamine treatment group (MDK group). The ketamine (10 mg/kg) or saline (0.9% NaCl) were administrated by intravenation in each group. FD group
FDK group
MD group and MDK group were modeled by the chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS). The behavioral tests included force swimming test
sucrose preference test and open filed test. The gut microbiota of mice was detected by 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. Qualitative analysis of bacteria in the specimen and predictive analysis of 16S rDNA function genes were conducted. The results were reported as mean values with their standard errors
and submitted to one-way ANOVA regardless sex difference and two-way ANOVA to analyze the effect of sex and ketamine on ameliorate depressive-like behaviors in mice
followed by the Tukey multiple comparisons test
with a statistical significance (P<0.05). Results: Compared with control group
the scores of forced swimming test were significantly prolonged
the scores of the sucrose preference test was significantly decreased
and the scores of open field test were significantly decreased (all P<0.05). These results were significantly ameliorated to varying degrees after subanesthetic dose of ketamine treatment (P<0.05). The diversity and abundance of intestinal flora in each group did not change significantly after CUMS and ketamine treatment. The reduction of Actinobacteria could be improved by subanesthetic dose of ketamine in depressed mice
regardless of sex difference. Furthermore
the relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae could be alleviated in depressed female mice
and Alistipes increased in depressed male mice. Conclusion: Mice of different genders showed different changes of intestinal flora in response to CUMS stimulation and subanesthetic ketamine treatment. The depressive-like behaviors can be ameliorated through increasing the abundance of Actinobacteria
alleviating the abundance of Bacteroidaceae in depressed female mice
and increasing Alistipes in depressed male mice after ketamine treatment.