Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-11-09
|
Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer
Health Medicine Research and PracticeVol. 19, Issue 10, Pages: 122-125(2022)
作者机构:
河南大学淮河医院普通外科
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R473.73
Published:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
Dou Qingqing, Han Jili, Gao Huihua. Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer. [J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice 19(10):122-125(2022)
DOI:
Dou Qingqing, Han Jili, Gao Huihua. Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer. [J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice 19(10):122-125(2022)DOI:
Application of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer
Objective To explore the effect of quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care in postoperative care of patients with cardiac cancer
so as to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods Eighty-seven patients who underwent cardiac cancer surgery in Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from January 2020 to January 2021 were selected as the study participants. The patients were assigned to the control group(n=43) and the experimental group(n=44) by random number table. Routine postoperative care was used in the control group
and quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care was used in the experimental group. The scores of the General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES)
Exercise of Self-Care Agency(ESCA)
Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)
Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD)
and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30(QOL-C30) for cancer patient were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in GSES and ESCA scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the GSES and ESCA scores in the two groups were significantly higher than those before the intervention
with the experimental group higher than the control group(P<0.05). Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in HAMA and HAMD scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the HAMA and HAMD scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention
with the experimental group lower than the control group(P<0.05). The incidence rate of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in QOL-C30 scores between the 2 groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the QOL-C30 scores of patients in both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention
with the experimental group lower than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Quantitative evaluation strategy-centered regulated care can improve the self-efficacy and self-care ability of patients with cardiac cancer after the operation
relieve negative emotions
reduce the occurrence of complications
and improve the quality of life. These benefits hold promise for a wider application of this procedure clinically.