Zhou Xianli,Song Caiping,Zhao Huan,Zhan Youjing,Tu Jingqiu,Zhou Houdi.Effect of family health education on treatment compliance in insulin-treated diabetic patients[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(19):2195-2198.
Zhou Xianli,Song Caiping,Zhao Huan,Zhan Youjing,Tu Jingqiu,Zhou Houdi.Effect of family health education on treatment compliance in insulin-treated diabetic patients[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(19):2195-2198.DOI:
Effect of family health education on treatment compliance in insulin-treated diabetic patients
摘要
目的 探讨以家庭为单位的健康教育模式对糖尿病患者院外胰岛素治疗依从性的影响。方法 选取2013年7-12月本院内分泌科收治需长期院外胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者120例。按随机化分组表分为对照组[n=60,男性38例,女性22例,年龄(58.93±14.15)岁,病程(7.82±5.62)年,采用针对患者本人的传统健康教育模式]和试验组[n=60,男性36例,女性24例,年龄(60.03±12.17)岁,病程(8.13±6.08)年,采用以家庭为单位的健康教育模式]。研究随访时间1年,对两组患者及家庭单位成员糖尿病院外胰岛素治疗相关知识的知晓率、患者治疗的依从性及家属在提高患者依从性中发挥的作用、患者空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白、尿微量蛋白等进行比较。结果 两组患者及家属糖尿病院外胰岛素治疗相关知识的知晓率(95.87% vs 81.26%
88.57% vs 31.86%)、患者糖尿病院外胰岛素治疗的依从性(88.33% vs 38.33%)、家属对患者依从性的影响(96.33% vs 28.33%)、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白[(6.27±1.35)% vs (6.86±1.24)%]、尿微量蛋白[(16.72±3.98) vs (24.62±5.05)mg/dL]等比较,试验组均显著优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论 基于以家庭为单位的健康教育模式能显著提高患者及家属(以一级亲属为主)糖尿病院外胰岛素治疗相关知识的知晓率,患者在家属的帮助下治疗依从性显著提高,从而提高院外胰岛素疗效(尤长期疗效)。
Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of taking family as an unit in health education on the treatment compliance for external insulin therapy for diabetes mellitus. Methods A total of 120 diabetic patients treated who admitted in our hospital between July and December 2013 and need longterm insulin therapy outside the hospital were enrolled in the trial. All the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups
the control group (group C
n=60
38 males and 22 females
at a mean age of 58.93±14.15
with a disease duration of 7.82±5.62 years) and the test group (group T
n=60
36 males and 24 females
at a mean age of 60.03±12.17
with a disease duration of 8.13±6.08 years). Traditional health education was given to the patients from the group C. The patients of the group T were given the health education by taking family as an unit. The follow-up duration was 1 year. In the process
the awareness rate of external insulin therapy
treatment compliance
and the role of the family member in improving the compliance were collected and analyzed between the 2 groups. The indicators of fasting blood glucose (FPG)
2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPBG)
glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and urinary microalbumin (mAlb) were measured and compared between the 2 groups. Results The awareness rate of external insulin therapy were better in the patients and family members between the group T and group C (95.87% vs 81.26%
88.57% vs 31.86%
P0.01). The treatment compliance (88.33% vs 38.33%) and role of family members in improving the compliance (96.33% vs 28.33%) were higher in the former than the latter groups (P0.01). The above-mentioned indicators were also better [HbA1c: (6.27±1.35)% vs (6.86±1.24)%; mAlb: (16.72±3.98) vs (24.62±5.05) mg/dL
P0.01]. Conclusion Health education of taking family (mainly to the first degree relatives) as an unit significantly improves the awareness rate of external insulin therapy in the diabetic patients with external insulin therapy and in their family members
promotes the treatment compliance of the patients with the aid of their relatives
and thus enhances the efficacy of external insulin therapy