Published:2016
移动端阅览
李红政,王骞,陈海燕,任晋文,赵晓瑾.军人表演型人格倾向筛查问卷的初步编制[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(20):2224-2231.
Li Hongzheng,Wang Qian,Chen Haiyan,Ren Jinwen,Zhao Xiaojin.Development of screening questionnaire for soldiers’ histrionic personality propensity[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(20):2224-2231.
李红政,王骞,陈海燕,任晋文,赵晓瑾.军人表演型人格倾向筛查问卷的初步编制[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2016,38(20):2224-2231. DOI:
Li Hongzheng,Wang Qian,Chen Haiyan,Ren Jinwen,Zhao Xiaojin.Development of screening questionnaire for soldiers’ histrionic personality propensity[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(20):2224-2231. DOI:
目的 编制符合部队需要的表演型人格倾向筛查工具。方法 根据临床经验和文献研究的结果,从现有量表中提取条目,经专家评议后形成试测问卷。使用试测问卷、PDQ-4+的表演型人格分量表对400名部队官兵施测;筛选出PDQ-4+表演型人格分量表为阳性的官兵后,用SCID-Ⅱ对这部分官兵实施访谈。通过探索性因素分析初步构建问卷结构,分析条目的区分度,问卷的信度、效度、灵敏度和特异度,最终确定量表的划界分。结果 经专家评议的试测问卷有37个条目有效,30个条目存在部分争议,25个条目专家认为无效;修订后进行试测,理解力测评显示除条目32、41、51外,其余条目均有90%以上的官兵认为可以理解。探索性因素分析后量表划分为易变性、关系认知、肤浅性、自我中心、挫折反应和挑逗行为六个因子,共可解释41.08%的变异,各因子可解释的变异在3.43%~18.40%之间。6个条目区分度不佳,18个区分度尚可的条目应作调整。量表的内部一致性信度Cronbach’s α系数为0.776,分半信度系数为0.625,效标效度为0.357(P0.05)。ROC曲线分析中AUC=0.910(P0.05),31.5分的灵敏度为0.848,特异度为0.875;32.5分的灵敏度为0.881,特异度为0.750,选取32分为量表划界分。结论 初步编制的表演型人格倾向筛查问卷可用于部队筛查表演型人格倾向。
Objective To develop the questionnaire for screening soldiers’ histrionic personality propensity for military personnel. Methods The pre-test questionnaire was established by selecting items from currently existing scales based on clinical experience and review of research literature
and approved by experts. Four hundred soldiers were participated in this investigation by taking the pretest questionnaire and personality diagnostic questionnaire-4th edition plus (PDQ-4+) for histrionic personality disorder. SCID-Ⅱ interview was additionally given for soldiers who were PDQ-4+ positive. By carrying out exploratory factor analysis (EFA)
the pre-test questionnaire’s construction as well as its discrimination
reliability
validity
sensitivity and specificity were tested. In addition
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for setting up the cutoff for finalizing the questionnaire. ResultsBased on experts’ evaluation
37 items were valid
30 were partly controversial and 25 were invalid in the pretest questionnaire. After modification
all of the items were considered as intelligible by above 90% soldiers in comprehension test
except items 32
41 and 51. The questionnaire was categorized in 6 factors after EFA: variability
relationship cognition
superficial
self-center
frustrated reactions and flirt behaviors. All of these 6 factors could explain 41.08% variation
and each single factor could explain 3.43%~18.40% variation. Discrimination analysis showed that 6 items were poorly distinguished and 18 items with comparatively better discrimination were adjustable. The reliability and validity of questionnaire could be accepted (Cronbach’s α was 0.776
half reliability coefficient was 0.625
and validity coefficient was 0.357
P0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.910 (P0.05) by ROC analysis. Due to the result that the sensitivity and specificity were 0.848 and 0.875 at score 31.5
0.881 and 0.750 at score 32.5
respectively
and score 32 was chosen as the cut-off of the questionnaire. Conclusion These results suggest that our developed questionnaire can be useful for screening histrionic personality propensity of soldiers.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
