Li Dongmei,Zhu Baosheng,Su Jie,Zhang Jinman,Yin Yifei,Chen Shu.Clinical value of fetal ultrasonography and prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities for criticalrisk pregnancies of Down syndrome[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(17):1972-1975.
Li Dongmei,Zhu Baosheng,Su Jie,Zhang Jinman,Yin Yifei,Chen Shu.Clinical value of fetal ultrasonography and prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities for criticalrisk pregnancies of Down syndrome[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2016,38(17):1972-1975.DOI:
Clinical value of fetal ultrasonography and prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities for criticalrisk pregnancies of Down syndrome
Objective To investigate the clinical significances of fetal ultrasound examination and prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormality for critical-risk pregnancies of Down syndrome (DS) in second trimester. Methods A retrospectively study was carried out on 2 281 pregnancies with critical-risk DS and on 2 500 low-risk cases admitted in our center from January 1
2012 to March 15
2016. Fetal ultrasonography was performed on all the 4 781 cases for the detection rates of single ultrasonographic soft markers
multiple ultrasonographic soft markers
single malformations
multiple malformations and other abnormalities. The results were compared between the 2 groups. Among those with critical-risk DS
1 332 cases who were aware of the situation accepted choose amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Results ①Fetal ultrasound examination detected 696 cases (30.51%) of single ultrasonographic soft markers
118 cases (5.17%) of multiple ultrasonographic soft markers
18 cases (0.79%) of single malformation
and 7 cases (0.31%) multiple malformations in the critical-risk group. But for the low-risk group
the above indicators were 308 cases (12.32%)
82 cases (3.28%)
5 cases (0.20%)
and 1 case (0.04%). The abnormal detection rates were significantly higher in the former than the latter group (P0.05). ②Amniocentesis indicated that among the 1 332 cases from critical-risk group
there were 135 cases complicated with single ultrasonographic soft markers
83 cases with multiple ultrasonographic soft markers
and 11 cases with single malformation. The 5 cases of multiple malformations had normal fetal chromosomal results. ③The abnormal rate of chromosome was 0.08% (11 cases)
including 10 cases of autosomal and 1 of sex chromosomealstructural abnormalities. Among them
7 cases were chromosome balanced translocation
3 cases inversion
and 1 case arm chromosome. Nine cases of maternal or paternal origins
and 2 cases of de novo mutations. Conclusion Fetal ultrasound examination can provide valuable information of genetic counseling for critical-risk DS pregnancies. Critical-risk DS also indicates increased risk of fetal chromosomal structure abnormalities.