Gu Lingchuan,Chen Guangxing,Yang Liu,He Rui,Peng Yang,Yang Pengfei.Reconstruction of acetabular bone loss with porous tantalum Jumbo acetabular component in revision hip arthroplasty[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(17):1776-1781.
Gu Lingchuan,Chen Guangxing,Yang Liu,He Rui,Peng Yang,Yang Pengfei.Reconstruction of acetabular bone loss with porous tantalum Jumbo acetabular component in revision hip arthroplasty[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(17):1776-1781.DOI:
Reconstruction of acetabular bone loss with porous tantalum Jumbo acetabular component in revision hip arthroplasty
Objective To explore the short-term efficacy of the reconstruction of acetabular bone loss with porous tantalum Jumbo acetabular component in revision hip arthroplasty. Methods Eighteen patients (18 hips) admitted in our center from september 2009 to september 2012 were enrolled in this study
and received acetabular replacement with tantalum Jumbo acetabular components. There were 8 males and 10 females
with the mean age of 56.8±15.3 years-old (ranging in 37-76 years-old). According to Paprosky classification
the acetabular bone defects were classified into 6 cases of type Ⅱb
7 cases of type Ⅱc
2 cases of type Ⅲa
and 3 cases of type Ⅲb. Data about prosthesis position
stability
bone ingrowth
survivorship
complications
Harris hip score and visual analogous scale (VAS) were analyzed. Results The mean follow-up time was 35.7 months (ranging in 24-54 months). To Paprosky Ⅱ
the Harris hip postoperative score (84.8±11.8) was significantly higher than the preoperative score (48.3±12.5) (t=-13.8
P0.01)
and the VAS postoperative score (1.1±0.7) was significantly lower than the preoperative score (3.8±1.5) (t=14.7
P0.01). To Paprosky Ⅲ
the Harris hip postoperative score (77.8±9.3) was significantly higher than the preoperative score (38.5±10.6) (t=-16.4
P0.01)
and the VAS postoperative score (1.9±1.2) was significantly lower than the preoperative score (5.1±1.6) (t=19.2
P0.01). All the acetabular components were well fixed based on the radiograph imaging results. No one had radiographic evidences of loosening
migration
radiolucent lines and osteolysis. Bone ingrowth was observed in all the patients. One case of dislocation occurred in the fourth week after the operation
and there was no infection or nerve injure. The survivorship of the tantalum Jumbo acetabular components was 100%. Conclusion The porous tantalum Jumbo acetabular component used for revision of acetabular bone defects shows good short-term therapeutic effect
and can simplify the operation
provide maximal surface contact between the components and the host bone
reduce the need for bone-grafting
promote bone ingrowth
and maximally normalize the hip center of rotation.