Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber
|更新时间:2026-01-09
|
Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber
Journal of Army Medical UniversityVol. 37, Issue 8, Pages: 730-735(2015)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:R318.08;TQ330.7;TQ333.93
Published:2015
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
陈兴,周鑫,张一鸣,石小花,樊东力.碳-硅橡胶机械性能和生物安全性的初步研究[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2015,37(08 ):730-735. Chen Xing,Zhou Xin,Zhang Yiming,Shi Xiaohua,Fan Dongli.Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(08 ):730-735.
陈兴, 周鑫, 张一鸣, et al. Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2015, 37(8): 730-735.
陈兴,周鑫,张一鸣,石小花,樊东力.碳-硅橡胶机械性能和生物安全性的初步研究[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2015,37(08 ):730-735. Chen Xing,Zhou Xin,Zhang Yiming,Shi Xiaohua,Fan Dongli.Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2015,37(08 ):730-735.DOI:
陈兴, 周鑫, 张一鸣, et al. Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2015, 37(8): 730-735.DOI:
Mechanical properties and bio-safety evaluation of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber
Objective To evaluate the mechanical properties and bio-safety of carbon ion implanted silicone rubber (C-SR). Methods According to the national standard
the mechanical properties were measured with a Shore durometer (type A) and an electronic universal testing machine to obtain parameters including Shore A hardness
tensile strength
elongation at break and tear strength. The bio-safety was evaluated by erythrocyte hemolysis test
systemic toxicity test
subcutaneous implant test
allergic and dermal irritation test
and pyrogenic test. Results The evaluation results showed that the C-SR had the same mechanical properties as pure SR. The erythrocyte hemolysis test showed that the hemolysis rate of C-SR was lower than the national standard
which indicated that in vivo transplantation of C-SR could not cause the hemolytic reaction of the body. The systemic toxicity test results showed that C-SR had no toxicity. The subcutaneous implant test indicated that C-SR had good safety and compatibility in the body. The allergic and dermal irritation test result was zero
the same as the negative control
suggesting that C-SR had no allergic and dermal irritation. In the pyrogenic reaction
the body temperature of rabbits averagely increased by 0.1 ℃
indicating that C-SR had no pyrogenic effect
in accordance with the demands of medical materials. Conclusion The carbon ion implantation does not change the mechanical properties of SR