Surgical short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study

刘驰; 唐波; 郝迎学; 石彦; 曾冬竹; 罗华星; 赵永亮; 钱锋; 余佩武

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Surgical short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study

更新时间：2026-01-09

- Surgical short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study
- Journal of Army Medical University Vol. 35, Issue 11, Pages: 1164-1166(2013)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： R197.39;R730.56;R735.2
- Published：2013
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘驰,唐波,郝迎学,石彦,曾冬竹,罗华星,赵永亮,钱锋,余佩武.达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术近期疗效的对照研究[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2013,35(11):1164-1166.

　Liu Chi,Tang Bo,Hao Yingxue,Shi Yan,Zeng Dongzhu,Luo Huaxing,Zhao Yongliang,Qian Feng,Yu Peiwu.Surgical short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2013,35(11):1164-1166.
刘驰,唐波,郝迎学,石彦,曾冬竹,罗华星,赵永亮,钱锋,余佩武.达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术近期疗效的对照研究[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2013,35(11):1164-1166. DOI：

　Liu Chi,Tang Bo,Hao Yingxue,Shi Yan,Zeng Dongzhu,Luo Huaxing,Zhao Yongliang,Qian Feng,Yu Peiwu.Surgical short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2013,35(11):1164-1166. DOI：

摘要

目的对比达芬奇机器人手术系统与腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌的临床近期疗效，以评估达芬奇机器人手术系统在治疗胃癌中的安全性及可行性。方法采用非随机对照设计，按照患者自愿的原则选择手术方式，分析2010年3月至2012年3月在本中心进行胃癌根治术患者的临床资料，其中使用达芬奇机器人手术系统进行胃癌根治术48例，以患者年龄、性别、BMI、肿瘤分期为协变量使用最邻配比法配对腹腔镜组手术患者48例。对比分析2组患者的手术指标、病例指标及术后短期疗效指标。2组患者手术均由同年资医师顺利完成。结果与腹腔镜组比较，达芬奇机器人手术组术中出血量更少[107.8±55.9)mL vs (132.7±61.5)mL，

=0.041

]

，淋巴结清扫更彻底[(34.7±5.2 )

(32.5±4.7)，

=0.026

]

，但手术时间更长 [(238.0±29.6)min

(221.5±33.1)min，

=0.011

]

。结论对比腹腔镜手术系统治疗胃癌，达芬奇机器人手术系统术中对患者造成的损伤更小，肿瘤清扫更为彻底。因此，使用达芬奇机器人手术系统治疗胃癌安全、可行。

Abstract

Objective To compare the short-term surgical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy with laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in order to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery system. Methods Clinical data of 48 patients undergoing robotic gastrectomy in our department from March 2010 to March 2012 were collected

and 48 patients receiving laparoscopic gastrectomy during the same period served as control. There was no significant difference in the age

sex

BMI and cancer stage between the 2

groups. All surgery was performed successfully by qualified surgeons with same years of experience. The operative indexes and short-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results Compared with the laparoscopic groups

the robotic group had less intraoperative blood loss (107.8±55.9

132.7±61.5 mL

P=0.041)

larger number of lymph node dissection (34.7±5.2

32.5±4.7

P=0.026) and longer operation time (238.0±29.6

221.5±33.1 min

=0.011). Conclusion Compared with conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy

robotic surgery system has less harm to the patients

with better resection of primary tumor

and more thorough dissection of lymph nodes. Thus

it is feasible and safe for gastric cancer.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Comparison of 2 procedures of gastrointestinal reconstruction by laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for tumours originating in the paracaval portion of caudate lobe

Therapeutic effect of laparoscopic-assisted treatment in children with imperforate anus and urethral fistula

Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis

Clinical study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy combined with transpyevic flexible ureteroscopy in treatment of multiple large staghorn calculi

Related Author

李仁杰

林恒

李建伟

张雷达

王小军

田峰

李雪松

欧晏娇

Related Institution

No data

⁰