Li Hua,Lyu Sha,Zhang Yongye,Song Shengfang.Evaluation of quality of life after LASIK by Chinese version of NEI-RQL-42 instrument[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2013,35(14):1507-1510.
Li Hua,Lyu Sha,Zhang Yongye,Song Shengfang.Evaluation of quality of life after LASIK by Chinese version of NEI-RQL-42 instrument[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2013,35(14):1507-1510.DOI:
Evaluation of quality of life after LASIK by Chinese version of NEI-RQL-42 instrument
目的 制定中文版屈光不正相关生存质量量表,并用于评价准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术 (laser assisted in situ keratomileusis
LASIK)手术效果。 方法 将美国国家眼科研究所屈光不正生存质量量表(42-item National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Questionnaire,NEI-RQL-42)翻译成中文,评价其信度及效度,对LASIK手术患者术前和术后进行常规视力和屈光检查的同时采用中文版量表评价其术前、术后生存质量的差异。 结果 经过系统的翻译、回译及文化调试等步骤所得的NEI-RQL-42中文版量表的克朗巴赫α系数>0.7,重测信度评价的组内相关系数为0.83~0.87,且具有良好的内容效度、结构效度及判别效度。LASIK术后1、3个月最佳矫正视力均恢复并超过术前水平(
Objective To set up a Chinese questionnaire for quality of life in vision-related patients with refractive error
and to investigate the changes of the quality of life after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods After the 42-item National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Questionnaire (NEI-RQL-42) was translated into Chin
ese
and its validity and reliability were investigated by surveying 126 patients undergoing LASIK in our department from November 2010 to May 2011. Except for assessing vision and refraction
such as uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA)
best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
before and after surgery
the quality of life of these patients were applied with the Chinese version of NEI-RQL-42 instrument. Results The systematic protocols were set as forward translations
backward translation and cultural adaptations. And the Cronbach α coefficient was defined as >0.7
while the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.83 to 0.87 as estimated by test-retest reliability. The Chinese version of the NEI-RQL-42 was confirmed with sound content validity
structure validity and discriminant validity. LASIK resulted in great improvement in BCVA
which was restored and superior to that before surgery (
P
0.05). Among the items of the questionnaire
except for the items of glare and symptoms
the scores of all items were increased after operation. The most obvious changed items were activity limitations
diurnal fluctuations
dependence on correction
suboptimal correction
appearance and satisfaction with correction(
P
0.05). The integrated score was 62.27±30.76 before operation
and was 81.64±25.38 and 82.14±23.27 respectively in 1 and 3 month after operation. The quality of life was greatly improved in 1 and 3 month after operation when compared with that before operation (
P
0.05). Conclusion The Chinese version of the NEI-RQL-42 is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the quality of life after LASIK. LASIK improves quality of life in patients with refractive error significantly.