Perioperative differences in open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

李雪梅; 季惠翔; 潘进洪; 方强; 周占松; 陈志文

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Perioperative differences in open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

更新时间：2026-01-09

- Perioperative differences in open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
- Journal of Army Medical University Vol. 35, Issue 15, Pages: 1601-1603(2013)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： R619;R699;R737.25
- Published：2013
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李雪梅,季惠翔,潘进洪,方强,周占松,陈志文.开放和经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术围手术期的临床差异分析[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2013,35(15):1601-1603.

　Li Xuemei,Ji Huixiang,Pan Jinhong,Fang Qiang,Zhou Zhansong,Chen Zhiwen.Perioperative differences in open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2013,35(15):1601-1603.
李雪梅,季惠翔,潘进洪,方强,周占松,陈志文.开放和经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术围手术期的临床差异分析[J].陆军军医大学学报(原第三军医大学学报),2013,35(15):1601-1603. DOI：

　Li Xuemei,Ji Huixiang,Pan Jinhong,Fang Qiang,Zhou Zhansong,Chen Zhiwen.Perioperative differences in open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2013,35(15):1601-1603. DOI：

摘要

目的探讨经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术较开放性前列腺癌根治术围手术期的优点。方法回顾分析2006年1月至2012年2月我科收治的75例前列腺癌患者的临床资料，对比开放性前列腺癌根治术与经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术两组患者围术期的临床特征及并发症等。结果经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术组的患者术中出血量和总输血量以及住院时间显著低于开放性前列腺癌根治术组（

0.05）。开放性前列腺癌根治术组与经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术组的总并发症分别为38.7%和18.2%（

0.05），其中重度并发症分别为6.5%和4.5%(

0.05)。结论经腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术因创伤小，术中出血量和围手术期输血量显著减少，总并发症率显著减少，最终可能节约了医疗资源。

Abstract

Objective To determine the perioperative advantages in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy. Methods The perioperative clinical characteristics in both groups of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy were reviewed and statistically investigated. The complications related to operations were recorded and graded according to the severity grading system of surgical complications. Results The blood loss

transfusion and days of hospital stay were significantly less in the group of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy than in the group of open radical prostatectomy. The incidences of total complications were 38.7% vs 18.2%

and the incidences of severe complications were 6.5% vs 4.5% in the groups of open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

respectively. Conclusion The blood loss

transfusion

complications and days of hospital stay are decreased significantly in minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery. Thus the medical resource is saved eventually.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Comparison of efficacy between robot-assisted laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and analysis on influencing factors

Machine learning-driven personalized tranexamic acid administration recommendations improve perioperative outcomes in orthopedic surgery patients: A large-scale database study

Prostate cancer T-stage intelligent diagnosis based on MRI images and deep learning

Risk factors for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Efficacy of robotic renal transplantation in perioperative period

Related Author

陈启铭

陈剑

刘秋礼

张尧

张军

舒泽华

王洛夫

兰卫华

Related Institution

Department of Anesthesiology， Hechuan People’s Hospital

Department of Anesthesiology， First Affiliated Hospital， Army Medical University （Third Military Medical University）

⁰