Individual subjective tension and salivary levels of α-amylase and glucocorticoid in college students with different levels of resilience in Trier social stress test
|更新时间:2026-01-09
|
Individual subjective tension and salivary levels of α-amylase and glucocorticoid in college students with different levels of resilience in Trier social stress test
Journal of Army Medical UniversityVol. 34, Issue 20, Pages: 2115-2118(2012)
Zuo Xin,Peng Li,Li Min,Wang Tao,Yu Yongju,Liu Yunbo.Individual subjective tension and salivary levels of α-amylase and glucocorticoid in college students with different levels of resilience in Trier social stress test[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2012,34(20):2115-2118.
Zuo Xin,Peng Li,Li Min,Wang Tao,Yu Yongju,Liu Yunbo.Individual subjective tension and salivary levels of α-amylase and glucocorticoid in college students with different levels of resilience in Trier social stress test[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2012,34(20):2115-2118.DOI:
Individual subjective tension and salivary levels of α-amylase and glucocorticoid in college students with different levels of resilience in Trier social stress test
salivary levels of α-amylase (sAA) and glucocorticoid (GC) in the individuals with different levels of resilience in Trier social stress test (TSST). Methods Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) was used in 160 students from a military medical university. According to the test results
22 individuals were selected
and 11 of them were assigned as high resilience group (n=11) and the other 11 was low resilience group (n=11). All these 22 individuals were male
with an average age of 20.16±0.77. The 2 groups had no significant difference in culture background
age and educational level (P0.05). The test follows the TSST standard procedures for the 2 groups. Their saliva samples were collected before and in 1
10 and 25 min after the test. Their subjective tension was evaluated by themselves at the same time points. Results Compared with the baseline value
the subjective tension in both high and low resilience groups reached its peak in 1 min after TSST and then declined to the lowest in 25 min. The tension in 1 min after TSST had significant difference in the high and low resilience groups (2.73±0.79 vs 3.64±0.51
P0.01). Compared with the baseline values
saliva levels of sAA and GC in the high resilience group was increased gradually after TSST experiment
and was significantly higher in 25 min (436.24±79.97 μmol/L and 1 003.03±259.26 μg/L
P0.01). While the levels were decreased in 1 min after TSST in the low resilience group
and then the level of sAA was elevated gradually and reached the highest in 25 min (478.29±108.72 μmol/L
P0.05)
but no significant difference was found in that of GC though it was also risen gradually (P0.05). Conclusion After TSST experiment
in acute stress
high resilience individuals response faster
with better recovery in their mood and hormone levels after stress when compared with low resilience people.