Liu Yaoyao,Dai Fei,Sun Dong,Luo Fei,Zhang Zehua,Xu Jianzhong.Influence of the volume of bone cement on the reinforcement of a novel canulated pedicle screw: a biomechanical study in vitro[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2012,34(16):1626-1629.
Liu Yaoyao,Dai Fei,Sun Dong,Luo Fei,Zhang Zehua,Xu Jianzhong.Influence of the volume of bone cement on the reinforcement of a novel canulated pedicle screw: a biomechanical study in vitro[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2012,34(16):1626-1629.DOI:
Influence of the volume of bone cement on the reinforcement of a novel canulated pedicle screw: a biomechanical study in vitro
Objective To evaluate the bone cement distribution and biomechanical stability of self-designed bone cement injectable canulated pedicle screw (CICPS). Methods CICPS
DTPS
TM
and solid pedicle screws were implanted into osteoporotic bone models (density: 0.16 g/cm
3
n=7) according to the clinical standard procedure. Four different volumes of bone cement (1
2
3 and 5 ml) were used to reinforce CICPS and DTPS
TM
respectively
and the solid pedicle screws were used as control. X-ray and CT were applied to observe the bone cement distribution in different groups. Maximum axial pullout strength test was used to analyze the relationship between the bone cement volume and maximum axial pullout strength
and the biomechanical stabilities of CICPS
DTPS
TM
and solid pedicle screws were compared. Results X-ray showed that there was no bone cement rear leakage in all screws. Three-dimensional reconstruction of X-ray and CT showed bone cement well and widely distributed through the three side holes of the CICPS in bone models. Bone cement flowed out mainly through the proximal side hole of the DTPS
TM
but rarely through the distal side hole. The maximum axial pullout strength of each group was as follows: solid pedicle screws: (28.5±4.0) N; CICPS: 1 ml (140.3±15.9) N
2 ml (197.1±9.8) N
3 ml (215.4±10.7) N and 5 ml (237.0±23.6) N; and DTPS
TM
: 1 ml (114.3±17.7) N
2 ml (180.5±13.6) N
3 ml (207.2±30.0) N and 5 ml (291.3±25.1) N. The maximum axial pullout strength of the CICPS and DTPS
TM
after reinforced by bone cement was significantly greater than that of the control group
and the strength increased along with the increase of bone cement volume. When the volume of bone cement was 1
2 and 3 ml
the biomechanical stability of the CICPS was higher than that of the DTPS
TM
(P0.05). When the volume of bone cement was 5 ml
the biomechanical stability of the DTPS
TM
was higher than that of the CICPS (P0.05). Conclusion It is effective to enhance the biomechanical stability of CICPS by bone cement reinforcement in osteoporotic bone model. When the volume of bone cement for clinical treatm
ent was 1-3 ml
the CICPS is proved safer and more stable than other products.