Wen Zhaoying,Zhang Zhaoqi,Yu Wei,Fan Zhanming,Du Jing,Lu Biao.Multi-detector CT versus cine magnetic resonance for assessing volume and function of left atrial and left atrial appendage: report of 48 cases[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2010,32(12):1336-1339.
Wen Zhaoying,Zhang Zhaoqi,Yu Wei,Fan Zhanming,Du Jing,Lu Biao.Multi-detector CT versus cine magnetic resonance for assessing volume and function of left atrial and left atrial appendage: report of 48 cases[J].J Amry Med Univ (J Third Mil Med Univ),2010,32(12):1336-1339.DOI:
Multi-detector CT versus cine magnetic resonance for assessing volume and function of left atrial and left atrial appendage: report of 48 cases
Objective To assess the performance of multi-detector CT (MDCT) to evaluate left atrial and left atrial appendage volume and function
and compare the results by cardiac cine MR (CMR). Methods Forty-eight patients who were referred for clinically-indicated CT coronary angiography in our department from March to December 2008
were included in the study.
MDCT data sets (Somatom Definition
Siemens Medical Solutions
Forchheim
Germany) and fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition ( FIESTA ) cines (Signa Excite HD 3T
GE ) of the vertical long axis covering the left atrium were obtained on the same day. All images were analyzed to obtain the maximum and minimum of left atrial volume (LAV
max
and LAV
min
)
the maximum and minimum of left atrial appendage volume (LAAV
max
and LAAV
min
)
left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF)
and left atrial appendage ejection fraction (LAAEF) using Heart Function software and Report Card 2.0 software
respectively
for MDCT and CMR. Intermodality agreement was tested through linear regression and t test. Interobserver variability were tested by Bland-Altman analyses. Results MDCT measurements resulted in good correlation (r0.75) compared with CMR. However
MDCT has a tendency to overestimate LAV
max
LAV
min
LAAV
max
and LAAV
min
and to underestimate LAEF and LAAEF but insignificantly. The interobserver variability in the MDCT measurements was lower than that of CMR values. Conclusion MDCT provides highly reliable and reproducible measurements of left atrial and left atrial appendage volume and function in patients referred for coronary CT imaging.